killface

10 ms·

61.
by killface 10y ago
why would a pro-hillary group flag a story on here that says she's not guilty of crimes (or at least that charges won't be pursued due to the actions not warranting criminal prosecution)? I'm literally in disbelief about how
62.
by killface 10y ago
Because the people who demand respectful discourse are the ones who rarely participate in it themselves.
63.
by killface 10y ago
Yep. Conservatives and their ilk are so thoroughly convinced of her guilt (and if not this, list off the 100 other witch hunts the republicans in congress have led against her). They'd rather flag and stifle discussion than let people
64.
by killface 10y ago
except there's a contingent of people (like the person you replied to) who won't accept anything short of jail time. they've already made up their minds. she's guilty, 100-point-zero percent confidence, and anything that
65.
by killface 10y ago
so you volunteer your salary to all your coworkers without demanding the same of them?
66.
by killface 10y ago
my first world anarchy is always voting 'no' for if a review helped if it's a vine voice or indicated that they got the product for free.
67.
by killface 10y ago
But sometimes there may not be a single concrete example. Some people just have that unfriendly vibe. Getting an example of "this one time Chad didn't want to talk to you because you were scowling the whole standup" probably
68.
by killface 10y ago
I can tell just from reading your replies in this thread that you're "that guy" -- the guy who always complains, who thinks he's better than every one else he works with, whose life motto is "the skill of accurate o
69.
by killface 10y ago
he's a creationist. i don't trust anything science-based he has to say.
70.
by killface 10y ago
Failing is also how you succeed. You learn all the ways to fail, then try to avoid that. You can't fail unless you try. You won't be willing to try if you are terrified of failure. The key thing is stop treating failure like some
71.
by killface 10y ago
Lol, if we switch the tech industry to text-only interviews, get ready for the full-day programming problems to come back. You get so much from speech cues, filler words, etc. To try to completely eliminate that and still make rational hiri
72.
by killface 10y ago
It's because we all know the 70c number is a lie when you actually compare experience, education, job role, and more stuff like that. I mean, don't try to bring it up with an SJW, but we all know the flaws of the study. the 70&#x2
73.
by killface 10y ago
Accurately and consistently measuring performance of professionals has been all but impossible for the better part of the last century. I don't know why we keep trying. This is what peer reviews are for.
74.
by killface 10y ago
Not just culture fit. I hire for a high-end (boutique) software consulting firm. We specialize in scale problems and engineering practice at a level few other firms can claim. Communication is an absolute, 100% must for senior roles. If you
75.
by killface 10y ago
If you're tracking the interviewer gender guess, that's a legal liability to the interviewer. I'd refuse to answer, or always put "unsure" even if I was 100% sure of the gender.
76.
by killface 10y ago
And that also means that at some point (ideally in the very near future), we're just going to have to be OK with the idea that not all women want to be STEM majors. This necessarily and explicitly means that the ratio will never be 50&
77.
by killface 10y ago
No. If you're a white male, that's bad. Anything else is diversity. They'll come up with some bullshit like "since women aren't the majority of hiring managers, this doesn't count as discrimination" or som
78.
by killface 10y ago
But implicit in that "gender bias-free" hiring is the assumption that current hiring is gender biased to the point of needing technical solutions that simply remove the human element. If you have a manager who thinks women can&#x2
79.
by killface 10y ago
I am with you 100%. We keep trying to invent ways to skew the hiring towards women. Let's just stop trying to candy-coat it. You want gender ratios, so just hire based on gender ratios and deal with the fallout. This narrative that wom
80.
by killface 10y ago
Lol, now these assholes also own the streets and traffic patterns around their houses. Good to know.
81.
by killface 10y ago
Blech. I have to use Gerrit at one of my current clients, and I fucking hate it. Github's workflow is easy. You have a repo, you can fork it or create a feature branch, you can add multiple commits, and then open a PR. That makes sense
82.
by killface 11y ago
This way is the only way we've found to do it, even on a smaller scale. Once you get above 20-25 jobs, or create a self service way for teams to create projects+github+jira+cloudformation+jenkins etc, you have to aggressively standardi
83.
by killface 11y ago
I still don't understand why people trust Oracle consultants. Their list of failures is ten miles long. I guess nobody gets fired for hiring Oracle.
84.
by killface 11y ago
I've mostly avoided IPv6 because AWS uses IPv4 and it works fine. but yeah, whenever I see an ipv6 format address, it takes way too long to parse it out. unless you were a network engineer at some point, it's not going to become s
85.
by killface 11y ago
Kind of like switching an addressing format?
86.
by killface 11y ago
I mean, look at their byline... "Original. Student Reported. Your Daily Dose of Right -Minded News and Commentary From Across the Nation" They emphasize "Right" which basically means it's just another conservative
87.
by killface 11y ago
i think they're hitting their hockey stick of adoption. it's been a necessary component for continuous delivery at high scale for a while, but it hasn't always been this easy.
88.
by killface 11y ago
Yep. This has solidified my opinion. I'm moving all my code off Github. Sorry, as a white male, I don't have to take this kind of blatant racism, abuse, and shaming when it comes to hosting my code. BitBucket does a good job witho
89.
by killface 11y ago
> I'm surprised of the negativity towards this action I'm not. This site is filled with grey-hat folks who would do anything to make a buck on the web. I mean, it's a forum hosted by/affiliated with a VC firm, and loo
90.
by killface 11y ago
google is not a government agency. you can't claim first amendment when dealing with private parties. that's like me suing the NFL for not letting me post racist rants on their homepage because of the first amendment. edit: i dun

More ›