kill9

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   I would have paid for an everyblock subscription. Sad to see NBC News shut it down.
2. 2.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   Well played.
3. 3.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   That's a quote from "a former G+ product manager". His credibility is beside the point anyway... this was a hypothetical feature mentioned in the article that conveniently illustrated a potential privacy concern. (To your prediction of how
4. 4.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   It's not just about having a profile or not. Google seems to be changing services to require G+. For example, you can no longer comment on YouTube or write a review in the Play store without a G+ profile (or at least I can't). This means th
5. 5.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   You don't seem to appreciate what a major change G+ will be for some of Google's users. I for one would never want the following scenario from the article to happen. Ever. "You'll go to search for a camp stove on Google, and you'
6. 6.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   I doubt tptacek will publicly reveal ways to exploit this (or any) vulnerability. EDIT Well... he might, but I've never seen him do it. He's a security professional, after all.
7. 7.▲
   by kill9 14y ago

   Yes, this page has a real torches-and-pitchforks feel to it. It's quite absurd. The howls of derision from people who flat out say they don't even use the framework and clearly don't understand the vulnerability are particularly ridiculous.