kilgnad

47 ms·

451.
by kilgnad 4y ago
I agree with this. But in a broad sense. In order for chatGPT to operate at a stack depth of 1 it must understand what itself is. Awareness of itself is also known as self awareness. As humans we are biased and I feel we set a milestone for
452.
by kilgnad 4y ago
No. I'm not mistaken here. Most people aren't. Clearly it's not creating a full bash shell and operating system. What it's doing is imitating one in the same way you can imitate a shell with a keyboard if given instructi
453.
by kilgnad 4y ago
When on the internet has something similar occured to a machine emulating a terminal, emulating the internet, emulating itself, then emulating itself creating another terminal? When has that happened? Never. So Of course chatGPT has to cons
454.
by kilgnad 4y ago
I have... you're not wrong about chatGPT lying becoming repetitive saying stuff that's incorrect. This is true. It is in many ways stupid. I've messed with this extensively. But the other angle is true too, it did emulate a t
455.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Either chatGPT made a careless error, or it lied to you. Both lying and making careless errors use to be both exclusive abilities of human beings.
456.
by kilgnad 4y ago
People are just latching on to the gotchas and the exceptions. Or they aren't really poking at this thing in-depth. ChatGPT is a different iteration of a language model. It does reasoning and it understands things.
457.
by kilgnad 4y ago
> Not sure why kilgnad is presenting this post as if they’ve seen The Truth. The terminal is ONLY a fraction of why that article is impressive. I feel you just skimmed it. You didn't read it to the end. The ending is what cinches th
458.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>I think like with most things about the human brain, we overestimate complexity and declare creativity ineffable. Agreed. If anything chatGPT is showing how trivial the whole concept of creativity is. It's not a big deal.
459.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>In addition, GPT is currently saturated with data; it has effectively all of the data. No this is not true. The reason why chatGPT is better then GPT-3 is because it's trained on additional reinforcement data to determine good and
460.
by kilgnad 4y ago
There's no example cue cards of itself. In, the ending of that article, chatGPT curled the internet from the virtual machine. It specifically curled the chatGPT api and talked to itself. Then it asked itself to create another virtual m
461.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>ChatGPT in it's current incarnation will not improve markedly. It's an architectural limitation at this point and more data might smooth out some rough spots, but it won't solve the behavior that this chain is describing.
462.
by kilgnad 4y ago
It does. Did you follow the link in my original post. https://www.engraved.blog/building-a-virtual-machine-inside/ Read it to the end. The end is quite mind blowing. I'm not sure how someone can finish this articl
463.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Did you follow that article to the end? It goes way beyond just filesystems. Filesystems are just some minor blip in that full story. Go read it. chatGPT is not trained on what a filesystem is. It's inferred what a file system is and h
464.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Did you look at the link in my post? It is literally doing the opposite of what you're saying here. Seriously read it to the end. Each task gets more and more complex and chatGPT successfully executes the task in a way that's very
465.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Understood. I'm saying that talking about a product and bouncing product ideas off of chatGPT and asking for variations and creative additions to the product is something this AI is actually good at and it is very helpful with. But yes
466.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Take a look at this: https://www.engraved.blog/building-a-virtual-machine-inside/ It's mindblowing. Read it to the end all the way to the mindblowing ending. I cannot for the life of me understand how someone can
467.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Actually that's not the main problem with the current state of the art LLM (chatGPT). You can speak to chatGPT like a human and it won't necessarily give you the answer you're looking for, but it will more often then not give
468.
by kilgnad 4y ago
Yes. This ^. ChatGPT is especially good at evolving and revising the main idea through a full on conversation. It is not just a query and answer machine. It is a full on conversational intelligence. Parent is incorrect. chatGPT is literally
469.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>If you'd like to take up debunking training myths, I'd suggest you look a little bit further into what VO2 max actually is, and what other types of fitness metrics also exist. It depends on the level you're looking at. Lo
470.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>Certainly not the same effect. HIT training doesn’t improve respiratory or cardiovascular fitness as effectively as continuous training does, and it doesn’t condition the muscles for endurance as effectively as continuous training does
471.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>In conclusion, if you're out of shape, you can improve a limited number of fitness measures just as much doing 3x8 minutes of higher intensity exercise as much 3×45m less intense exercise over 12 weeks Make no mistake. The metric H
472.
by kilgnad 4y ago
I've done this for a decade. It's real. I exercise a couple minutes doing all out sprints 3-4x a week and it increased my VO2 max faster then running 5 miles everyday. I've tried both. The increase in performance is dramatic.
473.
by kilgnad 4y ago
>We read every resume The attitude that this post conveys is that the advice she presents is universal. No. It's just her company and for her circumstance only. If you tailor your resume to fit her advice you'd be tailoring it
474.
by kilgnad 4y ago
And people say chatGPT is limited and can't generate original content. A lot of claims going around that chatGPT just generates generic content. Well, as weird as this is, it's totally original and creative.