Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
khazhoux
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
661.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I did a short-lived attempt at day-trading 15 years ago. Bought a few tens of thousands of NFLX, NVDA, and AMZN. Sold it all maybe a week later and made a couple thousand bucks, which I thought made me pretty smart.
662.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
If you like good French soup, you should definitely try soup du jour. It's amazing!
663.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
It is a painful admission, but in this world there are many people who are close to their families, close to their staff, keep a great house... and know technology better than you and have more impactful jobs that you and do more to i
664.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
The team that prides themselves on "we'll take a bit longer to get things right" usually winds up takes much , much longer ... and still gets it wrong. By that point, the fast team would be on their third iteration.
665.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Poe's law? Can't tell if you're joking.
666.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I like WFH. My company allows unrestricted WFH. But lately I've been going into office and the throughput of technical discussions is just an order of magnitude higher than in video calls or over Slack. I wish this wasn't the cas
667.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
You are correcting his terminology using a categorization (AR, MR, VR, XR, etc) which is not standardized or even commonly used. So what's the point of correcting? The simplest common-use definitions are: * Augmented: combines synthet
668.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Ha! This morning, laying in bed, I put on my AVP and saw that Dune 2 is now on Max. "I'll just watch five minutes..." You can imagine what happened :-)
669.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
> I do wonder how they will feel after the first time you ask them, "Hey, why were you at place X, I thought you told me you would be at place Y?" First, I have to say again that I'm not sitting there watching the map icon
670.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
This kind of snark is not appreciated here on HN. It is hostile to your fellow members, and does not advance the discussion.
671.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
> For starters, it features a guy blaming his wife for a decision No. Jessica's role here was a founding partner of YC, not as "his wife." His tweet says that Jessica (not Paul himself, or both together) was the person w
672.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Why would it bother you if your spouse+kids had access to your location? Honest question, because I don’t understand the sentiment.
673.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Ha, everyone here is forgetting that. And also, that all our personal documents were unencrypted :-) Parents could freely snoop if they wanted to.
674.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
We’ve talked about it. They don’t care.
675.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
“Tracking” is a scare word. The ability to see where my spouse is, when needed, without having to call or send a text, is a convenience. There’s nothing wrong with not sharing your location with your spouse if you don’t want to, but there
676.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Third option: it's a great convenience for the entire family to be able to access each other's whereabouts easily. My family can find my own location on their phones at any given time. I don't feel like I've lost privac
677.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
> I think the important part is whether the children are affected by the tracking I have no reason to think they're impacted by me knowing where they are. They're confident, run around for hours, and are growing up just fine.
678.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
> This constant tracking of kids is unnecessary and dangerous. Generations of kids survived without their parents needing to know their location at all times. This topic is always so alarmist. I have kids and a spouse. We all have Find
679.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Didn't know. I clicked around his About page and just saw blogs and more blogs. I see now.
680.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
edit: my bad, not a random blogger
681.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Yes, experience should (in theory) make one move faster. But that's not the full answer. In company after company, I've seen (and been amazed by) engineers who even at a young age (as in, first job out of college) somehow leapfro
682.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Yes, I totally grant that this was someone experienced in this specific discipline, who was not starting from blank slate. Perhaps one reason that there are so many low-productivity developers is because there's not as much opportunity
683.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Sure, we can ad hominem this all day. I suppose it's entirely possible the reason that in team after team over 20 years, the reason it's always a small number of engineers who get the most done, by a very wide margin, that the pr
684.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I wonder if this video is painful to watch for people who claim "10x programmers are a myth!" As an eng manager who's overseen teams at several top FAANGs, I can say without a doubt that most of those engineers would have tak
685.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
You can find the lowest performers in an org pretty easily through a combination of reviewing what they’ve gotten done the last year (via self reviews, manager reviews, a recap writeup etc) and looking at their commit history and docs or ot
686.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Can you post a link to the audio you think sounds like her? I’m very curious
687.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
The press says Sky voice is indistinguishable from Scarlett Johansson, but I hear zero similarities to her voice in any of her films. Besides, of course, that it is a standard-issue unaccented white anglo female.
688.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Bah! Live performance is one of life's greatest joys (and has been for over 2,500 years). So we grin and bear the ticketmaster extortion.
689.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Taylor’s not tracking you
690.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Yeah he’s an idiot on twitter. But he’s still smarter than both of us. Or I guess I shouldn’t include you in that, in case your day job happens to involve conducting high-level business and engineering reviews of manned spacecraft like El
More ›