Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
khazhoux
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
481.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
An example you may have learned about in school was Eli Whitney and the cotton gin. He thought his invention would reduce slavery by making it very cheap to clean the seeds out of picked cotton. Instead, this efficiency led to an explosio
482.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Reminds me of that quote from Paul McCartney and John Lennon (from The Beatles) about Jesus (from the Bible)...
483.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
For anyone who was confused, this is about the Mark Zuckerberg from Meta, not the other Mark Zuckerberg.
484.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
dang has provided an answer for how the algorithm works whenever I've asked similar question. But I still don't get it. 6 hours + 170 points and it's on third page. Meanwhile second page has "Null Byte on Steroids"
485.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Not quite, I believe this sell off was caused by Shockley showing with their "transistor" that the electricity demands of computers are not necessarily as high as everyone has assumed (as required by vacuum tubes). Electricity dem
486.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
No -- the people who chose not to vote supported the decision of the people who did.
487.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Everyone who chose not to vote effectively removed themselves from the set of people to be counted as either supporting or not supporting this administration.
488.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
How can someone who couldn't be bothered to vote possibly count in a discussion of how many people support this administration? Putting aside people who were unable to vote, everyone who chose not to, absolutely 100% gave up their
489.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Nope, those people don't count. You may as well point out that 89.7M dogs didn't vote for Trump. The majority of people wanted this.
490.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
The people that didn't vote don't count, figuratively or literally. You may as well have pointed out that only .1% of all mammals supported this, after accounting for dogs, cows, raccoons, mice...
491.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I'll add: - Not to be made to feel like shit constantly with non-stop criticism about every little thing you didn't 100% get perfectly right, meanwhile management has no accountability on all the stuff they fuck up, so long as the
492.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
30+ years later, I'm still always amazed at how effective the Mac debugger UI could be with such a tiny screen resolution. It's really quite masterful.
493.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I’ve been at several of the top tech companies and my observation is that most (though not all) the top executives do merit their positions. In terms of breadth of knowledge and perspective, depth on some number of key topics, and overall
494.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I could mail you my dissertation if you're interested
495.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Ha, me too! When the first title included Entscheidungsproblem I thought this would be intellectual edgelording. But, this is a legit list. Of course, you can't do justice to the entire field with such a short list. Two papers on we
496.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
People love that line, but is it true? The premise of this freeze --agree or not-- is that the U.S. Government spends too much. Or are you suggesting that this is to get back at NIH because of Fauci? Or, are you saying that Republicans hat
497.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
It is, though. The word "people" here refers in aggregate to the citizens who voted in November. It would be equally accurate for me to say "This is what we voted for" even though it's not what I voted for.
498.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I’ll challenge you: what action are you and your wife+family going to be taking based on the news? If that approximates zero, then you are only just stressing yourself.
499.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I've wanted to do this since 2016. It was November of 2015 when I first thought, "How long could I go not knowing if Hillary won or lost?" Eight years later, I've put it into effect, and my mind is so much clearer for
500.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Even 5 seconds of Trump is enough to cause rage. I'm powerless to change what he says and does, but I'm only empowered to keep it away from me. My friend's house (and entire town) burned down, so I'm following that news
501.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
After being a non-stop news and politics junkie the last 15+ years, I've gone beyond cold turkey. I stopped reading all political, U.S., and even world news the day after the election. Zero. Dropped reddit politics. I don't kno
502.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I understand your point, but I don’t think anyone used the word “wokeness” before the Right started it as insult.
503.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Actually, the origin of “wokeness”, the term, is right-leaning bigots who need to discount any grievance by any group of people who claim they might just possibly be suffering some systemic disadvantages in this country.
504.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
> People who have “leadership” skills are the ones that pay attention to their own leadership and are manage up more than anything else. No, it's actually people who can put together a technical plan and drive its execution with oth
505.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
I had to look up the name, and then realized (ha!) it's the pen I grew up on, across two countries. My body is probably full of microplastics from chewing away at them.
506.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Thank you, Sam Altman and everyone at OpenAI, for creating ChatGPT and unleashing the modern era of generative AI, which I use every day to speed up my job and coding at home. Signed, Someone who doesn't care that you're making $
507.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Ad Hominem
508.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
Maybe I'm confused then. So one would be permitted to post on Twitter: "khazhoux said yesterday: 'Megalopolis is the greatest film of the 21st century'"? I thought the point was you can't attribute -- no nam
509.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
That's what I said: it's to prevent people from being quoted publicly.
510.
▲
by
khazhoux
2y ago
No, I think it’s about not having to fear being retweeted publicly for what you intended to be private discussions.
More ›