khazhoux

22 ms·

451.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Not a coup. Trump said he was going to dismantle the government, and the majority empowered him to do so.
452.
by khazhoux 2y ago
There was just an election! The people literally just voted for this.
453.
by khazhoux 2y ago
[flagged]
454.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Trying to parse this. What are you saying?
455.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Incorrect. We are not all reaching AI fatigue.
456.
by khazhoux 2y ago
That is exactly what this thread is discussing. (You hardly needed a throwaway for this comment, though)
457.
by khazhoux 2y ago
With AI making traditional coding problems trivial, tech interviews are shifting toward practical, real-world challenges, system design, and debugging exercises rather than pure algorithm puzzles. Some companies are revisiting in-person whi
458.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Thank for you for a thoughtful answer. In a nutshell, you're advocating for a term-limit on roles like this, which is an entirely valid argument.
459.
by khazhoux 2y ago
> Social media was weaponized and turned into a tool that manipulates people's view of the reality I really dislike this argument. It shifts responsibility from the voters to evil nebulous puppet-masters. I reject that. At some p
460.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Not a contradiction at all. And this isn't about "sanewashing" Trump. There is a set of people eligible to vote. There is a set of people who do vote. Anyone in the first set who chooses not be in the second set, is no l
461.
by khazhoux 2y ago
I'm sorry, but how many non-voters were physically unable to vote? My heart goes out to them. But everyone else, who chose to stay home, chose to let others speak for them.
462.
by khazhoux 2y ago
> With regards specifically to Phyllis Fong, I have no confidence that an Inspector-General that occupied the office for twenty two years straight[1] can ethically perform their prescribed role. I am in complete agreement with her termin
463.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Everyone who decided not to vote literally relinquished their voice in the matter. They simply don't count. They were "OK" with whatever others decided. Their opinion has as much weight as my dog's (and I don't
464.
by khazhoux 2y ago
You see an electorate that wanted to cause harm. I see an electorate that thought anything is better than a black woman in charge. :-\
465.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Those people spoke loud and clear: "We're OK with whatever everyone else decides!" So again: the people have spoken. America is getting exactly what America wants.
466.
by khazhoux 2y ago
The people spoke very clearly in November: they wanted this.
467.
by khazhoux 2y ago
How are they major? Phrases like "I am going to the movies" and "I going to the movies" are effectively identical to an LLM. This is fundamental to how an LLM works.
468.
by khazhoux 2y ago
> Concentration camps have been operated by many regimes, not just the nazis. That equation is in your head. They may been operated by hundreds of regimes, but the term is 100% identified with Nazis now. It's a rather daft statemen
469.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Those are minor and common grammar errors and should have no effect
470.
by khazhoux 2y ago
For a Linux user, this seems quite trivial to replicate using any kernel since mid-2023, with lower latency and lower security exposure. Also, why have this as a hosted service when confetti popping can be spun up on a local deployment for
471.
by khazhoux 2y ago
To me the big question (which HN can't be bothered to discuss because SaM aLtMaN iS bAd) is whether DS shows that OpenAI can be done cheaply, or just copied cheaply. Your last sentence tells me you think DS built this from scratch. I
472.
by khazhoux 2y ago
You said "they're losing the race." They might lose, but I don't think we're seeing that yet. They undoubtedly gained a competitor over the weekend, but that didn't change their position as the leading AI com
473.
by khazhoux 2y ago
> It potentially cost the whole field in terms of innovation I don't see how, and you're not explaining it. If the models had been public this whole time, then... they would be protected against people publishing derivative mo
474.
by khazhoux 2y ago
I'm disappointed that 99% of the comments about this topic are Schadenfreude, and 1% is actually about the technical implications of OpenAI's claims.
475.
by khazhoux 2y ago
By what metric are they losing?
476.
by khazhoux 2y ago
What did delaying this cost them, though? Hurt feelings of people here who thought OpenAI personally pledged openness to them?
477.
by khazhoux 2y ago
To be clear, I was referring to the 1960's band The Beatles, and the religious text called The Bible.
478.
by khazhoux 2y ago
which was what?
479.
by khazhoux 2y ago
The vulnerability was fixed before the disclosure, so that's a non-issue here.
480.
by khazhoux 2y ago
Are you saying this report was falsified, or that the press should keep things like this secret?

More ›