khalic

6 ms·

91.
by khalic 2mo ago
It seems like a lot of techies should have chosen acting as a specialty, because I’ve never seen that much melodrama in one industry. FFS people, adapt, stop complaining
92.
by khalic 2mo ago
in what world is mistral a big player?
93.
by khalic 2mo ago
Not exactly top journalism...
94.
by khalic 2mo ago
Yeah, people are acting like it's not been decades of microsoft pumping out spaghetti code at industrial scale.
95.
by khalic 2mo ago
I'm not repeating myself
96.
by khalic 2mo ago
oh no I summoned the audiophiles by talking about knobs and chills :D just kidding, looks dope
97.
by khalic 2mo ago
I'm such a sucker for skeuomorphism... got chills clicking and turning those knobs
98.
by khalic 2mo ago
That’s his definition and in no way a universal one. In the meantime, it’s still very easy to differentiate between an AI and a human in a chat. You just need to know the quirks of these systems. Like counting letters, hitting the safeguard
99.
by khalic 2mo ago
ok so first the industry takes the AI term, uses it with a very vague resemblance to what it used to mean, for marketing purpose, then they latch on to the AGI term to talk about what people used to consider AI. Now there is no sign of actu
100.
by khalic 2mo ago
Congrats to the herdr team! Please don't abandon the open source part of the business when the cash starts flowing... every open source project that does a bait'n'switch is a stab at the viability of open source as a whole
101.
by khalic 2mo ago
It feels great to see this kind of story. We're all suffering from this (false) idea that we can't do anything, things are too bad, somebody else has done it before, or somebody else will do it. The fact is, humanity is pulled for
102.
by khalic 2mo ago
Ah the good old “he works differently thus he is wrong” fallacy. The best developers I know use a terminal and that’s it.
103.
by khalic 2mo ago
I have an AI newsdesk i vibed together because I was losing too much time hunting for facts inside the torrent of misinformation, I'll try to hook it up to the writers
104.
by khalic 2mo ago
Awesome idea
105.
by khalic 2mo ago
No it was on Kobo
106.
by khalic 2mo ago
I tried but the whole process is a miserable experience between the stale blog posts and the dead links… And then the UX… great project but could use a systems guy used to jailbreaking installations and a UX designer Edit: for kobo at least
107.
by khalic 2mo ago
That doesn’t answer my question…
108.
by khalic 2mo ago
That wasn’t really my question, was it?
109.
by khalic 2mo ago
Phase I trials happening now. Godspeed to them. It’s where most HIV vaccines die
110.
by khalic 3mo ago
Classic case of causality inversion. “People in remission of depression have a higher exercise rate” is the much more precise, much less sensationalist and much more honest take current studies.
111.
by khalic 3mo ago
Does it compiles to C? Wasm? I couldn’t find it the readme slop
112.
by khalic 3mo ago
The solution is… more copyright laws? Noooo thank you
113.
by khalic 3mo ago
Please don’t let your kids on this platform…
114.
by khalic 3mo ago
Yeah the consensus from everybody that spends some time on it seems to be: just don’t use it
115.
by khalic 3mo ago
I remember multiple projects giving up on rewriting it. Maybe a machine with endless patience could do it?
116.
by khalic 3mo ago
It’s tempting to associate both events, but when a sector is strung up like RL (representation learning) is right now, we’re bound to see things appearing at the same time. It happens a lot in frontier research, some people even publishing
117.
by khalic 3mo ago
Fiction, there are places that already do this without any of these fabled effects
118.
by khalic 3mo ago
I don't know what to say other than learn math
119.
by khalic 3mo ago
By volume sure, a part of the anti AI crowd is pretty extreme though, death threads, bomb threads, etc.
120.
by khalic 3mo ago
Are you discarding the utility of Gaussian functions in analysis simply because the independent variable is time? A Gaussian curve can be used as a descriptive model without claiming that the observations themselves are a probability distri

More ›