Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kgo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I don't see any reason why it would be much harder to hit the middle hops for a MiTM attack. It certainly wouldn't be worth setting up a MiTM attack between my house and the first Comcast router my cable hits. That approach doesn't scale.
92.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
There are multiple hops from you to the server. That scheme would only verify that BOTH your and the third party's initial hops haven't been simultaneously MiTM'ed. It's very possible the routes overlap for several hops. And even if they
93.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
And it looks like it's back up. Total downtime, about two hours.
94.
▲
Wikipedia's https certificate expired.
(secure.wikimedia.org)
13 points
by
kgo
16y ago
|
9 comments
95.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
The technical terms are 'variable assignment' and 'single assignment'. 'Assigment' is generally considered to mean the former unless it's qualified. From a pedantic perspective, you can't really disagree with the statement 'haskell support
96.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I intuitively knew this was the case, but wanted to do some research before posting an answer. The distinction between naming and assignment can be a little subtle. And you beat me to the punch. But I thought this page was interesting: h
97.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I agree on Real World Haskell. I couldn't put my finger on anything that was 'wrong' or 'bad' about the book, but just got bored with it and stopped reading halfway through.
98.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
You can pay for gmail and google calendar via Google Apps. I think that business model is "give it to home users for free, get corporate users to pay."
99.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
But as a general principal, you can't reliably or consistently do this in a dynamic language in any sort of guaranteed fashion, which was implicit in the original statement being refuted. Even with a runtime check, you still CAN pass in a b
100.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
1) If CL can only sometimes enforce invariants about type sometimes, and in special cases, I'd argue that the original statement was true. You'll still be deprived in many (probably most) cases. (People have survived falls where their par
101.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
Any good investment plan involved diversification. If you buy one house, one bad tennant could mean six months or more of no rent payments while you go through the eviction process and try to get someone else in there. One really bad tenna
102.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
You need a verifiable SSN to get an iPhone?!? Attn drug dealers, you can get BlackBerries and Droids from Boost or Cricket without giving any personal information.
103.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
Well compared to the ssh banner, it is in a secured data center. All the people in there (hopefully) have been assigned some baseline level of trust. I really hope the story behind that rope is more like: "What the fuck did you do? Every
104.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
And here's the rather useless security advisory: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/790070/00011931251107... With helpful tips like (paraphrasing) "don't use facebook on your critical systems" and "only give people the rights they nee
105.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
But if even you can't guess the right answer, then that doesn't really count, does it? Hacker can't get access to your account, but neither can you. Might as well have entered sdaw4#$%@#$%#$5. I'm talking about the scenario where someone
106.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
you actually have some code that is yours That's the important thing. Sometimes the initial excitement of seeing that github account wanes when you realize 8 projects are forks of existing projects with one change, and the other two are
107.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I'm at a start-up now, but before that I got sick of developing professionally and took a break. Probably because I was one of those people who didn't look good enough on paper, and only got through the resume pile at corporate jobs or bod
108.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
Better than nothing, but that's still easily brute-forcible, even by humans.
109.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I basically do the same when they're required. And then I still get sites yelling because my dogs name can't have #$ in it! Or because I pasted the same complex second password into all three security questions!
110.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
The article headline is misleading, it's talking about a three-day survival kit. But if we're talking a real-world, full-out, Mad Max apocalypse, one where society as we know it will never recover, yeah, I'd want a gun.
111.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
So the plan is: 1) Keep on using twitter as much as ever. 2) Shift the support burden from twitter to companies that twitter would prefer to see go out of business. ?
112.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I like git just fine, but it does have over 100 subcommands, way more than any other source control system. If you're using it on a solo project, you're probably using 4-5. Don't worry, some day you'll get the dreaded 'octopus merge' erro
113.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
If they are standard and public and they work, sure. If they're not public and not standard (like MacRuby) then probably not. I think the GP post was simply referring to the fact that a vast majority of software is 'installed' on the mac.
114.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
This guy isn't complaining about source code or licensing issues. He's complaining that MacRuby isn't in a shared location, like say libc or some other standard library. He wants to just be able to type 'macruby foo.rb' (or whatever) and h
115.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I'm assuming Gates is talking about a reading comprehension test. Like the ones grade school where you needed to read a paragraph and then determine the age of Mount Rushmore. How someone did as part of the follow up (What did you think
116.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
From the article, he wouldn't have been surprised at even a factor of 10x, he clearly wasn't expecting them to perform as well as him.
117.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
How is this any different than analyzing any other evidence that someone tried to destroy? Using some infrared or whatever filter do determine what a burnt document said? Determining that your fireplace has human remains? Does the accept
118.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
I don't think it's an issue of technology. If they rotated satellites just to track him, I wouldn't have an issue. I think it's an issue of being invasive. They invaded his property to attach the device. The device remained inside his p
119.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
On the reddit thread way back, many people pointed out he could be charged with destruction of government property. I believe a few people even had precedences of this actually happening. But I'm not going to dig through the thread, so I'
120.
▲
by
kgo
16y ago
Why? Because I'd need to wait 20 hours to get that critical life-changing email? If it was critical, someone could call my home phone, my cell phone, text me, actually have the local police stop by my apartment, etc. This winter was prett
More ›