kghe3X

4 ms·

1.
by kghe3X 3y ago
Just where is an inexperienced new grad making $170k out of the gate? I find this difficult to believe. Are you normalizing for cost of living? I suspect, most Boeing employees aren't based in the Valley.
2.
by kghe3X 3y ago
I think the analogy holds. Printing presses can't produce hand-drawn calligraphy just like Midjourney can't produce art outside some boundary on it's training set. Both are limited in capability compared to humans, both have
3.
by kghe3X 3y ago
Analysis paralysis
4.
by kghe3X 3y ago
Well, it's not.
5.
by kghe3X 3y ago
Maybe if you read it you would realize why the title makes sense.
6.
by kghe3X 4y ago
What I'd love to see is a language with a first class grammars to replace many uses of regexes or badly written DSL's, like what Perl6 tried to do. There is recent research in this area. https://conservancy.umn.edu&#x
7.
by kghe3X 4y ago
What's to stop us from applying the same rationale to humans once the line between artificial intelligence and human intelligence becomes sufficiently blurred?
8.
by kghe3X 4y ago
While I generally agree that we should minimize harm when in doubt, I don't think your analogy holds up. First, Pascal's wager is flawed in that it assumes there are two known outcomes, when the outcomes are unknown in both qualit
9.
by kghe3X 4y ago
I think proposed UUID v7 is sortable, FWIW. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-u...
10.
by kghe3X 4y ago
We asked a large language model, GPT-3, to complete the sentence “Peanut butter and pineapples___”. It said: “Peanut butter and pineapples are a great combination. The sweet and savory flavors of peanut butter and pineapple complement each
11.
by kghe3X 4y ago
Taking salad != eating salad
12.
by kghe3X 4y ago
You could say the same about pinky toe removal and stubbed toes.
13.
by kghe3X 4y ago
Humans don't have continuity of input. They put their brains to sleep daily.
14.
by kghe3X 4y ago
A few things wrong with this in my opinion. 1. If simulation of a mental phenomenon is not equivalent, in essence, to the phenomenon itself, then what's a meaningful difference between the two? What is this elusive essence of the pheno