Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kgeist
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
541.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
For me, just changing the body position already works. Sometimes I lie down on a coach and suddenly it "clicks".
542.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
For me, AI is super helpful with one-off scripts, which I happen to write quite often when doing research. Just yesterday, I had to check my assumptions are true about a certain aspect of our live system and all I had was a large file whic
543.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
The code is from 2003.
544.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Just checked out the original version of b2 Wordpress was forked from and could immediately spot a SQL injection which I can use to take over the whole site: $log = $HTTP_POST_VARS["log"]; <..> $user_login=$log
545.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Wikipedia has a dedicated article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unusually_shaped_fruits_and_ve...
546.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
>The reason WordPress sites don’t get hacked as much anymore is we work with hosts to block vulnerabilities at the network layer I wonder what it means.
547.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Tried the 1B model with the "think step by step" prompt. It gets "which is larger: 9.11 or 9.9?" right if it manages to mention that decimals need to be compared first in its step-by-step thinking. If it skips mentioning
548.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
A student of mine had an assignment to write a game using SFML, they wrote a FlappyBird clone and it was like a few hundred lines of code. It's not a very complex program to write. To be honest, I think 4k is too much :)
549.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
When I tried Nextcloud, I found there was an option to sync all photos from Google Photos. It synced around 10% photos and reported success. Overall, Nextcloud had lots of breaking bugs/instability issues like that in almost all cases
550.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
>This alone is an indictment of their "reasoning" capability. I'm not sure why it says anything about their reasoning capability. Some people are blind and can't see anything. Some people are short-sighted and can
551.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
On the other hand, we often create over-engineered solutions because taking the simpler route would require us to rewrite existing cruft, which is often just more expensive.
552.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Reminds of this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17135841
553.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
The majority of microservice architectures end up being distributed monoliths.
554.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
>org chart becomes architecture Tbh, it didn't work for us: our org chart changes more frequently than the codebase's architecture (people come and go, so teams are combined, split, etc. to account for that, many devs also like
555.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
>It's like when discussing communism with some diehard fans - when you point out the flaws, the response is always "well that wasn't real communism that's why it failed". Nitpicking, but the Soviet Union, for exa
556.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
>What do you even talk about for an hour? We once had 1 hour long standups. The reasons were: 1) large team 2) many devs loved to go into detail about their work, and no one stopped them 3) the expectation was that a standup must be abou
557.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Our PM quit a month ago and now we have stand-ups without any managers. I think it made the developers more responsible and involved: every stand-up a new dev gets the role of a facilitator. Previously, it was a one-man show. The stand-ups
558.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
I understand what it means, I'd like to know where the monolith architecture stands in this context. One of our projects was originally a monolith, and each tenant had their own dedicated DB the monolith connected to. Then they switche
559.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
A few years ago, after having worked on a microservice-oriented project for some time, I joined a team which developed a monolith. To be honest, it felt like a breath of fresh air. What previously took coordination across multiple teams and
560.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
You mean it's easier to shard databases per tenant when it's a monolith?
561.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Not as bad as the Pidora project https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1...
562.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
We had to make something similar. We have both huge tenants (200k users in one tenant) and small tenants with 10 users. Sometimes there are spikes when a large tenant generates thousands of jobs. In a naive implementation, 1 tenant would be
563.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41535865 There's no problem if a specific sum is negotiated beforehand. Doesn't OpenAI bill at the end of the month post factum?
564.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Well imagine how it looks from the point of view of anti-discrimination and consumer protection laws: we charge this person an additional $100 because we have some imaginary units telling us they owe us $100... Just trust us. Not sure it wi
565.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
In my country, it's illegal to charge different people differently if there's no explicitly signed agreement where the both sides agree to it. Without an agreement, there must be a reasonable and verifiable justification for a cha
566.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
Asked it to write PyTorch code which trains an LLM and it produced 23 steps in 62 seconds. With gpt4-o it immediately failed with random errors like mismatched tensor shapes and stuff like that. The code produced by gpt-o1 seemed to work fo
567.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
They call GPT4 a legacy model, maybe that's why they don't compare to it.
568.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
We had one case when a developer realized his algorithm had a severe reliability problem when he realized he had no idea how to handle one specific error returned by one of the called functions. I remember us discussing that if it was writ
569.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
After JetBrains discontinued Upsource, we tried several code review tools and it shocked us that many of the tools (both commercial and open source) don't have built-in tools to review incrementally. It's just just on big soup of
570.
▲
by
kgeist
2y ago
It says game development can be made simple and then throws a whole of jargon at you: clojure vectors, datomics, atoms, transactions, malli schemas... Can someone explain?
More ›