kffl

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kffl 4y ago

   That's an interesting use case. I am not aware of any tools that would allow for such content-aware proxying of HTTP traffic with artificial latency introduced in the response headers content parts separately. As of now, speedbump is p
2. 2.▲
   by kffl 4y ago

   netmem allows for traffic shaping at the kernel-level, whereas speedbump operates on a TCP connection level. While netmem can be used for adding a fixed delay to network traffic (or a randomly generated one for each packet following a given
3. 3.▲
   by kffl 4y ago

   Wow, I didn't expect my project to get posted here. Thanks a lot! I can see that many people are drawing comparisons with tc/netmem, which speedbump is not intended to replace, so I think it's best if I provide some additiona
4. 4.▲
   by kffl 4y ago

   Sure, tc can be used for adding a fixed delay (or random delay that follows a given distribution) to network traffic. In the use case that prompted me to develop speedbump (testing application metrics collection and visualization), I wanted
5. 5.▲
   Show HN: Bunny REST Proxy – a HTTP message broker built on top of RabbitMQ(github.com)

   2 points by kffl 4y ago|0 comments