keynan

3 ms·

1.
by keynan 6y ago
I agree this is optimal, however politics is a thing and you went and used the word tax.
2.
by keynan 6y ago
Maybe next you'd like to guess their star sign
3.
by keynan 6y ago
3Blue1Brown
4.
by keynan 8y ago
The question isn't "is it worth learning" it's "is it worth learning next". What do you already know? Focus on learning theory and standards (e.x. HTTP, websockets, MVC, security principals) and learning tools
5.
by keynan 8y ago
I'd like to have an aws glacier backup tool. I'd expect it to be open source, and be simple enough to read over. If it encrypts and decrypts documents too that's a plus
6.
by keynan 8y ago
Pick what your passionate about and learn it deeply. However you would be well advised to take atleased one course on: - networking, focus TCP - Compilers, focus theory behind lex and yacc, or equivalent - parallel algorithms, focus on lock
7.
by keynan 8y ago
That is incorrect. You've just defined P2P such that no commonly accepted P2P application meets it. At a minimum every P2P app you've likely ever heard of or used, baring maybe one exception, has at a minimum used third parties fo
8.
by keynan 9y ago
btw, Algebra Chapter 0 is excellent
9.
by keynan 9y ago
Capital by picketty, and Dictators handbook
10.
by keynan 9y ago
> A plausible proof of "P != NP" won't be quite as simple to express, since it needs to prove that all such algorithms do not run in polynomial time. That sounds hard but, If for any NP-Complete problem there exists no P s
11.
Show HN: Auto build project for non-IDE users(bitbucket.org)
1 points by keynan 10y ago|0 comments
12.
by keynan 11y ago
Anywhere visa is excepted, by which we mean ~half the U.S. because Americans have that much awareness of the rest of the world.
13.
by keynan 11y ago
livecoding & twich