keymone

103 ms·

931.
by keymone 8y ago
> The same trick works for higher powers. can you demonstrate?
932.
by keymone 8y ago
how many of those who have enough money to never work again, never work again? you severely underestimate the psychological desire to be useful and live a fulfilling life. the evidence is there - it's ideological convictions that preve
933.
by keymone 8y ago
> we should find work for them to do that benefits society in some way introduce basic income and people will make themselves useful.
934.
by keymone 8y ago
i mostly meant bullets, knives and baseball bats.
935.
by keymone 8y ago
truth eventually was found with regard to tobacco and lead, sugar is just around the corner.
936.
by keymone 8y ago
> let people make their own decisions about what they put in their bodies why not let people make their decisions about what they put in other people's bodies then? if they do damage - they suffer consequences, so it all should b
937.
by keymone 8y ago
> What’s next? A game where Coca-Cola poisons mankind? He’d be surprised.
938.
by keymone 8y ago
Being able to deterministically look at what database looked like at any point in time is priceless for debugging/investigating sessions.
939.
by keymone 8y ago
> in return for having to solve the "puzzle", programmers in more strongly-typed languages gain numerous other advantages advantages and disadvantages. and solution to the puzzle is almost always wrong or becomes outdated and r
940.
by keymone 8y ago
> Clojure, for one, would not be very attractive without having adopted Bagwell’s data structure concepts. i don't think Clojure ever "adopted" Bagwell's data structures, it was designed around them and few other co
941.
by keymone 8y ago
The puzzle is not some inherent problem within the one you’re actually solving, it only arises because of limitations of any type system you choose to work with.
942.
by keymone 8y ago
Static typing doesn’t reduce bug density, this is no news, just a risk compensation principle at work. But there’s another factor: static typing creates a nice puzzle for you to solve instead of solving the actual problem. You solve the puz
943.
by keymone 8y ago
to each their own. laptop display only, fullscreen all the time, took some time to get used to, but now my desk has nothing but a charging cable and i'm comfortable in any environment. i found having multiple windows in eyesight too di
944.
by keymone 8y ago
i have two 4-deep threads with that person, nobody else commented, calling that a flamewar is a bit of a stretch, but ok, point taken.
945.
by keymone 8y ago
nothing to say about ketones and krebs cycle? still going to insist carbs are essential macronutrient? > take your [citation needed] practices somewhere else i like this forum very much, specifically because i see how it's inhabitan
946.
by keymone 8y ago
> it’s relevant and counterintuitive that the lethal dose amount for table salt is as low as it is, while remaining an essential nutrient Relevant to what? And why are you describing it as if it’s strange? It takes 15 grams of iron to ki
947.
by keymone 8y ago
So consuming large portion of salt is a suicide, how about consuming large portion of sugar? https://www.quora.com/How-much-is-a-deadly-dose-of-sugar Or large portion of water? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik
948.
by keymone 8y ago
Can you link sources to those claims? For instance carbs are absolutely not essential [1], one can live healthy life without a gram of carbohydrates. So I’m interested where are you getting your information. [1] https://academic.
949.
by keymone 8y ago
Fructose is literally poison. Also not being more harmful than sugar is not much of a compliment, there are very few things that brought more harm to humans than sugar.
950.
by keymone 8y ago
> An efficient JSON-like message encoding how is this still "the future"?
951.
by keymone 8y ago
Congrats and all the best!
952.
by keymone 8y ago
having lots of money is malicious?
953.
by keymone 8y ago
> conference accepted sure. > peer reviewed not so sure.
954.
by keymone 8y ago
> There are proofs that the network converges properly as long as people don't violate those conditions do you have a link to those proofs? i've seen proofs already where underlying assumptions were something like "major
955.
by keymone 8y ago
> If the 51% user is truly malicious, the majority of network participants will move away to the new chain, rendering the 51% user's tokens (near) worthless. so being successful is punished by destroying all wealth of the richest pa
956.
by keymone 8y ago
> signing two different blocks at the same block height is a conflict i don't need to sign at same height to be a participant in an attack.
957.
by keymone 8y ago
> If any m of n stakers submit their part of the signature, a random number is created; no smaller subset of stakers can predict what that number will be, and the number is the same regardless of which stakers submit. so the number is kn
958.
by keymone 8y ago
flipping a bit takes energy. if you flip a bit and also release heat - your bit-flipping hardware is inefficient.
959.
by keymone 8y ago
> opportunity cost of locking up capital that's one part and it is also paid by PoW miners by buying the hardware. then there is another part - block rewards. where's MC=MR int hat for PoS? > solutions to stake grinding only
960.
by keymone 8y ago
one party already holds >50%, don't forget that Ethereum is a pre-mine scam.

More ›