kevin_b_er

6 ms·

1.
by kevin_b_er 2mo ago
This is a false statement. > Your use of the SAM Materials will not involve or encourage others to reverse engineer, decompile or discover the underlying components of the SAM Materials. > Your use of the DINO Materials will not invol
2.
by kevin_b_er 1y ago
By "class action" I presume you're referring to the US. If so, no, the courts of law are forbidden to you. You will instead go to a secret tribunal where the laws do not matter. The arbiter will only continue to be paid if th
3.
by kevin_b_er 1y ago
And that's where drones and robots come in. The goal is to make sure there's no more uprisings, ever again. You need only look at the US, where the rich are given all the benefits in changes in law, and the commoner gets nothing e
4.
by kevin_b_er 1y ago
That was written by you? I don't agree with this section: > The HDCP converter simply announces itself as a final video endpoint… yet still repeats the content to its output port. Without a very expensive HDMI protocol analyzer, we
5.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
Kalamazoo is the result of consolidation. The graph incorrectly just lists them as "Kalamazoo Tower", but its also a TRACON facility. They're handling multiple airports remotely. In 2016, this was planned to be Grand Rapids,
6.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
Because none of that is the purpose of cryptocurrency. It for tax evasion by the rich, and for the cryptocurrency to seize when its used for crimes or when its defrauded out of someone else. And for riding a seemingly permanently rising cur
7.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
America loved to build _in the past_. Now the workers cost too much, even when paid poorly, and the top must profit on an exponential curve.
8.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
The author intends it to be a modified Apache 2. 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, ro
9.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
That name is not in English, as evidenced by the non-English letter.
10.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
> Its strange how much power we give employers over employees, and how regular people defend this, even when its actively working against them. "Because, one day, I will be a rich person, and I will be able to be cruel to the little
11.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
You can read their Motor Vehicle Order Agreement. Mandatory Binding Arbitration. https://www.epi.org/publication/the-arbitration-epidemic/ https://centerjd.org/system/files/ArbitrationWhi
12.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
The case is already dead. If you bought a Tesla, you have no right to a court of law involving Tesla. It will go to arbitration, where the case will be secret, but Tesla will know the arguments and results of of all attempts against it, but
13.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
Full paper at https://www.cureus.com/articles/141805-zinc-supplementation-... and not this summary. Key limitations: They only used 5 papers > There were limitations to this study. A small number of studies were ass
14.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
Neither hackaday.com nor gist.github.com seem to support ipv6, so this seems pretty ironic. Good for unique address assignments for IoT I suppose, but still seemingly terrible for a user agent.
15.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
This is very light on the details of their batteries, unfortunately. Iron-air batteries have been known for awhile now, the challenge is making them commercially viable. If I recall, their efficiency is awful for one. There's a company
16.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
This will likely be canceled, like the previous iteration. It will just take months of arguments before the "amended complaint" is resolved. You have no rights against Tesla. All disputes will go to a for-profit psuedo-court known
17.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
If it isn't about asset forfeiture, then what is the hearing about?
18.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
Not "profit", but a duty to maximize shareholder value. eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark A Delaware Corporation has a duty to maximize shareholder value. That's the majority of all publicly held US corporations. So I m
19.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
And when the politics of greed and the science of truth come to odds? Therein lies the rub.
20.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
This looks like a tool for Google/Alphabet to use to improve ads or make it more difficult to use unapproved browsers under the guise of 'privacy'. An astroturf feature not unlike ManifestV3.
21.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
Those tarballs are PGP signed, too..
22.
by kevin_b_er 2y ago
They appear to have moved carefully to set this up over the course of weeks by setting up the framework to perform this attack. I would now presume this person to be a hostile actor and their contributions anywhere and everywhere must be au
23.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
Skyhook apparently threatens companies that try to crowdsource such things, case in point Mozilla. So, you're either paying off the patent troll or using their services.
24.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
This is disingenuous take. We're not talking about the IRS, but the company they outsourced to that demands a lot from you. You lose the basic right to access courts of law, and ID.me gains nearly unlimited capacity to harm you without
25.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
Are you sure you aren't thinking of HDCP? It is separate from HDMI, and DisplayPort does HDCP too.
26.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
80% of all water used by humans in California are for agriculture. The pistachios and alfalfa are what use up all the water, not the generic population. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Water-Use-And-Efficiency/Agric.
27.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
"The system" for you and me, not the system for those at the top. They'll maintain their wealth. You're presuming the rich care about "the system". That they have morals or ethics. They do not.
28.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
The purpose of AI, and the entire drive of investment in it, is to eliminate labor costs. There's no other purpose. It is not to advance science or make a better world, it is to make money. That money comes by the expense of the many a
29.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
You are hoping for altruistic behavior in a highly capitalist environment. This is incorrect. It will not be used for anything but control and punishment.
30.
by kevin_b_er 3y ago
If buying is not owning, then piracy is not theft.

More ›