Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kernelPan1c
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
5y ago
I've taken my stack of old laptops and created a microk8s cluster out of them for the purpose of self-hosting random stuff.
2.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
7y ago
Agreed, this is a problem that we will solve through scientific innovation in power generation (nuclear) and carbon sequestration. The solutions that fall in the emotional domain often involve legislation and a reduction in quality of life.
3.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
7y ago
Industrial control systems are experiencing the growing pains of letting go of older technology that was designed prior to security being much of a concern. ICS networks are often designed to be 'air gapped'. All too often the air
4.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
7y ago
Full-disk encryption. https://www.howtogeek.com/234826/how-to-enable-full-disk-enc... Nothing more than speculation but...I suspect if you aren't using an open source OS, it's possible the NSA has a backdoor
5.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
How does this work?
6.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
Confidential...as in only you, the recipients, Google, the NSA, and other intelligence agencies the NSA shares information with can read these emails.
7.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
Is this the right #? 1517486 points to something about a tug crew error. https://titan-server.arc.nasa.gov/ASRSPublicQueryWizard/Quer...
8.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
I understand the sentiment. I certainly have my own bouts of intense paranoia related to security and the privacy of my personal stuff. It can become unhealthy. However, I think as long as the majority are complicit with email providers tha
9.
▲
Ask HN: What do you use for personal email?
11 points
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
|
13 comments
10.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
Ah, I guess the point I'm missing is that with a 'serverless' setup, the cloud provider must have access to your private key? Unless you use some sort of key server setup (what they call Keyless SSL)
11.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
> "has never turned over their SSL keys or customers’ SSL keys to anyone;" How would they be able to give up customers' SSL keys?
12.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
I have an XPS 15 9550 as well and primarily use ubuntu. I feel your pain on the failure to hibernate/heating up in a bag. Dell seems to have had plenty of issues with buggy BIOS and motherboards on this laptop. Last week mine became af
13.
▲
The Shape of Water – Flow Without a Flowmeter
(specificenergy.com)
2 points
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
8y ago
Rockstar to push an update and make this cheat irrelevant?
15.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
I wonder how Rice got this data. The more interesting story is that if you can get this data (MITM or some other means), you could front run a fund by figuring out who they’re researching.
16.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Everyone knows that orders are executed fairly on SEC regulated exchanges, right? Ehhh, not really. It's important to look back on Flash Boys and recognize the reality of regulated exchanges. Ultimately consumer demands will drive the
17.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
How could Facebook detect an infected machine? > A Facebook spokesperson said Charity may have been asked to download the wrong software because some malware can spoof what kind of computer a person is running Just changed the user agent
18.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Yes! PoS poses a much greater risk of centralization
19.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
> You're criticizing Tor for something that's impossible to solve. If you think that's possible then please open a ticket Not criticizing tor. Just pointing out a couple of ways in which a tor user could give themselves up
20.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Yes, anonymity and security are separate but related issues.
21.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
If you access an http site, a government controlled exit node could inject js and eventually gather enough info through profiling mouse movements and browsing habits to ID you. Even with https, if the feds are in cahoots with the certificat
22.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Agreed. Bitcoin solves some problems with current forms of payment that shouldn't be unique to blockchain. Credit cards and checks are the equivalent of giving vendors your wallet's private key.
23.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
> So we will inevitably end up with some variation of Proof of Stake protocol – where we will simply have to trust some users more than others Doesn't this defeat the point? I can't imagine a scenario in which a proof of stake
24.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Isn't this just key pinning? I'd like to see a P2P system. This way governments can't force CA's to allow MITM.
25.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
I agree, VPS providers don't inherently provide any added security or privacy.There's not much that would stop these providers from jumping at an offer to hand over your data for a pile of cash. If you want privacy, use Tor. If yo
26.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Regulation doesn't affect the ability of a currency to be influenced. It just puts that ability in the hands of a select few. The US govt prints money to pay off maturing debt. After some time, this scheme will come to a disastrous end
27.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Yes, since you can't trust the JS, doing this would be an attempt at security through obfuscation. I mostly just think it's strange that these keys aren't accessible. If there were ever a mismatch detected, the server could a
28.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Public key pinning helps but it operates on the assumption that the initial key is the correct one. I find it curious that these public keys are not readable by the client.
29.
▲
by
kernelPan1c
9y ago
Yes, greater for security but still depends upon reliability of certificate authorities and ISPs. ISPs have the ability to issue the client a bogus certificate while they hold the real one in order to decrypt traffic. Why won't browser