Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
keneda7
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
121.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I would agree with you for the most part but also keep in mind 200k may not be the top 5% for particular locations. In San Fran county the top 5% is 808k ( https://www.kqed.org/news/11799308/bay-area-has-highest-in
122.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
So you are too claiming twitter check marks are for verification. But they are not any more. Its really funny that you know better than actual official twitter support account. https://nitter.net/TwitterSupport/statu
123.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Why don't you take a look at not well known people on the right vs not well known people on the left. There is a massive imbalance of checkmarks. There is some arbitrary committee that decides whether or not you get a blue check mark.
124.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I would disagree. Sure protomail may be used by nefarious actors but there are also plenty of security minded people that use it too. A majority of those users are not doing anything nefarious at all. They simply don't want anyone s
125.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I have to disagree. The blue check mark does not verify who you are. It verified your political ideology matched up with that of the blue check mark committee. Half the US population is already being held hostage by that group. You seem
126.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
The US massively over spends pretty much everywhere. Healthcare? Yup. Space? Yup. Government salaries? Yup. New toilets? Yup. Propaganda? Yup. I'm not even touching on the massive amount of fraud our handouts have or all the no bid g
127.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Very cool site. Thank you very much. I have always used usafacts.org to view spending but after I quick glance I think the site you linked is much easier to view and understand. Crazy how everyone always talks about of defense spending ye
128.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
You hit the nail on the head in your post. The mysterious Twitter checkmark committee that got to gatekeep who could be in their group. Then people (probably the committee itself) started pushing the idea that blue check marks are more re
129.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
No its not. However a hotel room allows them a place to stay and clean while they look for a job and get on their feet. Once they have a job, they can look for a home. Seems to me you expect all the working people to just pony up money an
130.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
So the way I read the accepted answer is a private company can censor. They can make up their own rules and do what they want even if the government is not allowed to do the same. However there is nothing in any of the cases referenced (t
131.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I took a look and I am not sure anymore. I found this: https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/79102/what-is-the-na... The first answer links to a couple different cases. I am not a lawyer but it does seem that
132.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
So you claim the solution is something that has already been done. SF uses millions to house homeless in hotels. They also have tens of millions dedicated to programs to help educate, find jobs, and get people off of drugs. Yet with your
133.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Private companies are not required to abide by the first amendment. However it is illegal for the government to ask private companies to censor. The old press secretary, Psaki, went on TV and admitted their administration regularly asks s
134.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
You keep linking this study likes it proves your point but it does not. It has similar issues to the ones you listed above. It ignores things like repeat infections, feedback loops, and population structure. Using the same logic your stu
135.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Okay thank you that makes more sense. But from an outsider reading the conversation as is, that is not very clear at all. Do you have any proof that shutting down schools was huge? Everything I have seen says the exact opposite. Little t
136.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I don't think people are going to come to the conclusion you want. I thought I understood your position at the start but by the end I am just scratching my head here. You seem to admit covid is airborne yet at the same time are adama
137.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
The fans used to push or pull air through a carbon filter are typically pretty loud. Hard not to be when you are moving so much air. You can get quitter ones but they are expensive. If you are going the carbon filter/canfan route it
138.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I recently switched from a carbon filter with a canfan to a medifyair MA-40. I think the medifyair is far superior to the straight carbon filter. It also is significantly quitter than my old set up and still pushed ~220 CPM. They are a l
139.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I recently ran across BFF and asked the same exact question. The answers to your question so far do not seem to address it in my opinion. Correct me if you are wrong but you are saying why does IOS, Andriod, ect each have there own API gat
140.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
What do you like about the show more than the films so far?
141.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I honestly don't pay close attention to NIMBY/anti-house regulations anywhere outside northern California to notice. I should have been more clear I was not specifically talking about that. In this case I was thinking primarily o
142.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Off the top of my head, Texas. Texas was a majority solid red for a long time. Now a massive influx of has made multiple seats that historically have been safely red, competitive, or even flip to blue. Look at the places people are moving
143.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Do you think it is people moving or do you think it is people moving and then voting in people to enact the same policies as the location they moved from? If person A leaves a location because of crap/idiotic policies/laws, moves
144.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Do you happen to have a link? I see in the Washington examiners article them mention illegal immigration a few times but it always seems to be referencing another stat.
145.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Are these deaths of just migrants illegally enter the country or do they represent all migrants regardless of whether they use a port of entry or not?
146.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Not the person you asked but I poked around to see what I could find. Seems like a bunch of random sites all taking about some leaker. I could find nothing concrete to support them running hot. https://www.google.com/searc
147.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I run into so many issues when trying to do video calls and screen share. Random disconnects, random program crashes, extreme latency, distorted video, ect. It is really frustrating when your company uses it for an internal chat/meet
148.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
Yes you are correct, the democratic governor was recalled, then somehow Schwarzenegger won reelection. As someone who lived there and still does, I do not think the state was red in any way, rather the left was sick of what was happen unde
149.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
I fully support this idea. Though in this case would it only apply to doctor lawmakers?
150.
▲
by
keneda7
4y ago
This is completely incorrect. The CA senate has been democratic since 1970. Besides 95-96 the CA assembly has been democratic since 1970. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Legislature#:... . Please don&#x
More ›