4 ms·
Why don't you take a look at not well known people on the right vs not well known people on the left. There is a massive imbalance of checkmarks. There is some
by keneda7 4y ago
Why don't you take a look at not well known people on the right vs not well known people on the left. There is a massive imbalance of checkmarks. There is some arbitrary committee that decides whether or not you get a blue check mark.
The person I responded to said its used to verify your identity. If that was the case anyone who verified their identity should have one. But that is not how it worked. You could verify your identity and still not get a blue check mark if the committee decided to not give you one.
Also I'm confused where you got communists? I never once said anything about communists. At least try to have a good faith discussion instead of making up random things.
- RavingGoat 4y agoI'm calling bullcrap. Tons of far right people have been verified. Give me a not well know person on the left that has been verified and a comparable right person that was turned down.
- keneda7 4y agoSo you are too claiming twitter check marks are for verification. But they are not any more. Its really funny that you know better than actual official twitter support account. https://nitter.net/TwitterSupport/status/930926295034224641 https://nitter.net/TwitterSupport/status/930926295034224641 "This perception became worse when we opened up verification for public submissions and verified people who we in no way endorse" Directly from the horse mouth. Blue check marks are for people they endorse. They changed to rules to ensure it stayed that way.