kendowns

4 ms·

1.
by kendowns 16y ago
Does intelligence involve dealing with facts? Cuz the title is factually incorrect.
2.
by kendowns 16y ago
SEA DRAGON!!! WOOOO!!!!
3.
by kendowns 16y ago
About 12 on a TI calculator. 13 on TRS-80 Basic, 13 or 14 for Assembly
4.
by kendowns 18y ago
Nope. kqr2 had it right, the approach was to move parameters into tables that the user could edit. Asking the user to spell anything out is not in the cards for that example.
5.
The Argument for Normalization(database-programmer.blogspot.com)
1 points by kendowns 18y ago|0 comments
6.
by kendowns 18y ago
Actually I have, it is extremely cool. For my own case I don't know where it will fit in yet, as I currently do fine without it, but its one of those things I follow.
7.
by kendowns 18y ago
You can have your cake and eat it too, and you don't have to compromise. All you have to do is recognize where the browser's original intent may be different from your own (doc mgmnt versus transactional database mgmt). Making the browser
8.
by kendowns 18y ago
The actual reason I gave in the OP was easy distribution. This is huge . I think also that my OP could have been stronger pointing out that the job is completely doable (in fact I've done it), with a sort of "here are the problems you wil
9.
by kendowns 18y ago
A cursory google search gave no obvious explanation of this, do you have a specific link to serve as a starting point?
10.
by kendowns 18y ago
Yes, the code-is-data is one of those frustratingly true-but-out-of-context things. I created a complete framework that builds databases out of a text file (YAML it so happens) including security and automations ( http://www.andromeda-proj
11.
by kendowns 18y ago
I think that in this case you get a non-trivial performance gain with some basic implementation improvements. You can replace the row-by-row round trip with a single SQL UPDATE with a LIMIT (or a LIMITed subquery if the server does it that