keko039ndnfm

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by keko039ndnfm 8y ago

   They question the correctness of decisions made by the US judiciary system from inside the system They decide if the inside of the box is working correctly in an undemocratic fashion, based upon their biases Not the correctness of the US ju
2. 2.▲
   by keko039ndnfm 8y ago

   It’s the same in the US The masses are bought in and ignore it Not one of the judges on the SC questions the correctness of the process They just regurgitate the things they’ve been taught and studied There is no more outside the box consid
3. 3.▲
   by keko039ndnfm 8y ago

   The second statement is false. How much a candidate raises has been correlated to ability to win. That eliminates anyone that can’t raise money. And Kavanaugh’s nomination casts doubt on the third statement. You can be a vile POS, but becom
4. 4.▲
   by keko039ndnfm 8y ago

   There are customers and potential customers, that have called them out for it. So yeah.
5. 5.▲
   by keko039ndnfm 8y ago

   “It’s just...” followed by a personal opinion is not a great justification
6. 6.▲
   by keko039ndnfm 8y ago

   That’s too reductionist. Big corps are making huge profits while laying people off. Pursuit of an outcome alone isn’t enough. The process too must be in service to humanity at large to reach your conclusion. Too many processes today benefit