Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
keikobadthebad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
> None of the banned people mentioned a fork Steady on, at least one of them wrote a big blog post on his own site Dec 20 basically prematurely accepting the honour. https://joost.blog/wordpress-leadership/ I can im
2.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Bro, you did read the article you are commenting on, right?
3.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Reading it I'm not sure if this is just a unilateral communist-style purge or an actual fork launch (or both). Here's hoping the fork gets off the ground and removes most of the pressure creating this nastiness that isn't he
4.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
The guy is refusing to spend money on what you think is in "the [best] interests of wordpress users", presumably that is what you think is in your interests, and you're complaining about that. It's a gpl project, if the
5.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Correct link: https://zedshaw.com/blog/2017-12-30-photographing-art/
6.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Article itself actually hates rto, and the author found > 60% - that's 3 days a week - untenable.
7.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
See first, mbedtls and openssl with $0 FOSS licensing. Wolfssl needs a 'commercial license' to ship it in a proprietary product: > Businesses and enterprises who wish to incorporate wolfSSL products into proprietary appliances
8.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
No argumentation, just downvotes... as I said, seems a lot of people bringing out their worst.
9.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Really seems a lot of people bringing out their worst. If you want to fork it, fork it, leave the wordpress name and trademarks, do your better thing. Just drop anything that belongs to someone else who has no reason to join this effort. I
10.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
It sounds like with the surprise ruling to force service provision to wpe, and this response, there's little desire to be the free provider of dev infrastructure on the part of wp any more. Which is understandable if you're being
11.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
If only the torygraph could put the sackcloth and ashes down long enough to use data to contrast the same metrics under tory and labour.
12.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
... why write on HN about it? What do you think the people here can or will do? There's an endless trickle of these kind of posts, I have never seen one with a resolution that satisfied the OP.
13.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
The only way in this situation (which sounds like private capital took it over to run it into the ground taking the last profits) would seem to be 'up your game' by moving to a new company. Then 'the system' is not your
14.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
The article seems to gloss that WP is made available under GPL2+. What's the point attacking Automattic for making money when they fund the core development and make it available to everyone? It's even still available to WP Engi
15.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
> Update 2023-11-05 Yeah, I've got an LE cert now. And I don't want to talk about it. You can still get paid certs, but the max validity period is shrinking, to 45 days in 2027 https://blog.nameshield.com/blog
16.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
From Sept 26
17.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
It's hard to square 'antitrust' with continued availability to use and ship stuff based on GPL core code, and continued right to fork and do their own development. Trademark rights are real and separate from copyright, it
18.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
That site has a count of sites moved off WP Engine (currently 17K) and a graph showing the total rising over time. And some JS highlighting individual sites. So it obviously is recording sites that moved off WP Engine. It looks like they
19.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
https://wordpressenginetracker.com/ ... they seem to be recording sites that already moved from WP Engine... how is it 'anticompetitive' exactly?
20.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Shouldn't you deploy your grasp of young generation vernacular against the VP-elect who miserably failed to tell his 'cool story'?
21.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
> I forget who it was OK bro
22.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
There are two separate, distinct, things here. Are you 'justified' to decide to use your granted rights to step up and do something about what's bothering you? Yes. If you have enough energy, you can fork and gather people
23.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
I had a thing where github for some reason no longer accepted my email was trusted for the github account. It required setting the email again and going through the validation again. Then it started talking to me as usual. Not sure if your
24.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
What do you think happens if it's decided (by the service provider) you or your company failed to abide by a code of conduct... your access to the services are revoked. It seems right to say if access to what the free service does is i
25.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
> It will be tapped out [sic] in 2025 So... won't exist until end 2025 and suffer yield difficulties. Nobody can test it. It doesn't sound like it's on the top 10 of Intel's problems even.
26.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Looks like a lot of work, basically it's the unsupported bsp pieces on all the different physical platforms, on Ubuntu. This is a very thankless task if the board vendors (who will have access to Rockchip support) won't help eithe
27.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
If it's something other than a static site, most likely the platform it is on will go eol and no hands left to keep it alive.
28.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
Today it really boils down to the buyer accepts the work (usually work done in the period) as reasonable and pays for it, or not. Sometimes there are contractual requirements to make good on bugs afterwards on your own time. But often the
29.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
But in FOSS the original project is not under any requirement to care, and may use a license that explicitly disclaims caring. Maybe it means the original project will get forked (or perhaps helped) if it doesn't take care of everythin
30.
▲
by
keikobadthebad
2y ago
It's possible... but if it's open-ended what you're supposed to solve (eg, "security") it seems hard to be confident you won't be run into the ground trying to satisfy unlimited demands.
More ›