keernan

25 ms·

361.
by keernan 2y ago
In that regard, his argument that corporate entities are illegally censoring X for political views flies in the face of the SCOTUS opinion in Citizens United. Ironic since Citizens United enables billionaires like Musk to use their corporat
362.
by keernan 2y ago
Under Musk's legal theory, advocating for boycotts is illegal.
363.
by keernan 2y ago
I believe the most immediate AI impact will be identifying patterns in data that result in breakthroughs in medicine and other science fields.
364.
by keernan 2y ago
My dad was transferred to LA when I was in 9th grade in 1967. I was excited at the thought of living in warmth amid enormous palm trees. Alas, I was shocked to see so many oil rigs yards from the land side of the coast highway. PS: I absolu
365.
by keernan 2y ago
I was a programming enthusiast back then. I bought lots of programming books and the authors were often present providing assistance. We would engage in 'live' conversations on the bulletin boards via the automated sync program. I
366.
by keernan 2y ago
I am 72. My father worked for one company his entire life. He worked for one company his entire life, from 1931 to 1976. He started sweeping floors and ended as a Senior VP. In 1975 his employer went bankrupt and my dad received 8 cents on
367.
by keernan 2y ago
If my memory serves me correctly, it was part of the results of the CAPM study by Sharpe and Markowitz for which they won the a Nobel.
368.
by keernan 2y ago
Vanguard's target date retirement funds furthest from retirement do not have a 100% stock allocation simply because studies have established that a 90/10 stock/bond portfolio outperforms a 100% stock allocation.
369.
by keernan 2y ago
>Browse our catalog of 80,000+ classes
370.
by keernan 2y ago
I spent an hour defending (keeping the boxes unchecked) a 5x5 grid. I spent that time because of what happened. Others began helping defend the same grid. I have no idea how many people joined, but checkmarks on any of the 25 boxes in the g
371.
by keernan 2y ago
It isn't enough to examine 'what' this Court rules. Examining the 'why' will often be more instructive.
372.
by keernan 2y ago
I've been doing something similar for awhile. Using my old laptop (damaged keyboard just like OP). Set 'lid close' to "do nothing" (it runs 24/7 with the lid always closed). Connected to TV via HDMI. Only app i
373.
by keernan 2y ago
Here's the actual study. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5...
374.
by keernan 2y ago
I didn't see the debate. Nor have I listened to the news. But I've been saying to my family for weeks that the best thing that could happen for Democrats right now is for Biden's incapacitation to be exposed to the world at t
375.
by keernan 2y ago
I was a department manager at a Fortune 500 Company that required every department head to rank all the department employees from 1 - (n) based upon performance and importance to the department. Senior VPs had to do the same for the departm
376.
by keernan 2y ago
'Wall Street wants' is a non-sequitur and is simply jargon for 'Billionaires want'. And the article itself is worse. It talks about the 'problem' being employers not wanting to hire 70 year old workers when whi
377.
by keernan 2y ago
Whether an employee is exempt from the legal protections requiring payment for overtime is defined by labor laws and is based upon the nature of the work performed by the employee. Ever since labor laws were enacted, employers have fought t
378.
by keernan 2y ago
The original United States Constitution very clearly protected the interests of the aristocracy. You couldn't participate in the government unless you were white; male; and owned real property. And it provided further protections again
379.
by keernan 2y ago
I only read the original source provided by /skilled below. Very interesting read. Future Shock by Alvin Toffler predicted this exact thing. The theme of his book is that the pace of change had reached an inflection point where society
380.
by keernan 2y ago
If technical analysis worked, the conundrum is that revealing the secret would result in the world following the chart, which would have the effect of changing the indicator so it no longer worked. Presumably anyone who ever found a technic
381.
by keernan 2y ago
quote from CNNs daily financial news: >>At their peak in 1996, there were 7,300 publicly traded companies in the US. Today there are about 4,300. >>Nearly 90% of all firms with revenues greater than $100 million are now private,
382.
by keernan 2y ago
Become a life long avid reader. Asking people online is fine; but there is nothing better than educating yourself by reading the world's most recommended books.
383.
by keernan 2y ago
There are lots of strongly pro-Russian politicians and members of the media in the United States too. If Putin is paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to the far right in Europe, why in the world would anyone believe the same isn't
384.
by keernan 2y ago
If you live in the USA, an event as catastrophic as an asteroid the size of the moon striking the earth is potentially happening on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. Do something about it.
385.
by keernan 2y ago
Russia uses drones and mercenaries supplied to Russia by other countries. While nuclear war is an ongoing danger, the world cannot allow itself to be held hostage by the likes of Putin.
386.
by keernan 2y ago
Public service announcement. Technical trading is the equivalent of using astrology for investments. It is not a science and has been roundly refuted as junk for well over 25 years. If you are thinking about actively trading or, worse, &quo
387.
by keernan 2y ago
The article makes the assumption humans will be deciding what software needs to be produced. I foresee a future where machines digest ongoing streams of data and decide what societal adjustments / refinements should be made to accompl
388.
by keernan 2y ago
While I agree with the overall premise that mega-corporations are controlling the public's use of the internet, I disagree with the underlying statement: >>He was able to do this because the internet, which had been publicly avai
389.
by keernan 2y ago
I keep seeing headlines similar to the above ("Second Boeing Whistleblower"). The headline is simply a lie and misrepresentation. Josh Dean was not a Boeing Whistleblower. He is a Whistleblower against his employer, Spirit AeroSys
390.
by keernan 3y ago
>Scientists still baffled Completely fictitious title. Not one mention of a scientist, no less a baffled one, anywhere in the 'article'.

More ›