Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
keenerd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
46 ms
·
361.
▲
by
keenerd
12y ago
> Or did I miss some hidden gems of either of them? My three favorite features of Screen are ones the Tmux devs are strongly against adding. * Digraphs * Serial terminal * Nethack mode Digraphs are mostly for portability - when ssh-ing f
362.
▲
by
keenerd
12y ago
> this isn't providing any of the key technologies we need for a manned Mars mission It would give a really good reason to dust off NERVA, the engine tech Nasa planned to use for a Mars mission in the '70s. Safe, too. NERVA f
363.
▲
by
keenerd
12y ago
Those have never been used "beyond the moon" and as such are not within the scope of discussion :-)
364.
▲
by
keenerd
12y ago
Voyager 1 and New Horizons. You are ignoring heat output. Curiosity's reactor produces 2kW of heat and 125W of electricity. The heat is more important - it is what keeps the rover from dying at night. Heat output is really useful for
365.
▲
by
keenerd
12y ago
Offline versions: https://archive.org/details/nasa_techdoc_19880069935
366.
▲
by
keenerd
12y ago
> Its beyond our current level of civilization. We have projected only milliwatts to any distance beyond the moon. We have a 2kW nuclear reactor rolling around Mars at the moment. 400 watts in the interstellar neighborhood. 200W curre
367.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
I've done something similar, a one-button interface hooked up to a basic machine learning backend. http://kmkeen.com/albumbler/
368.
▲
An introduction to thinking declaratively and Boolean Satisfaction
(kmkeen.com)
1 points
by
keenerd
13y ago
|
0 comments
369.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Declarative programming is a great one, almost a magical experience. "It feels like I am sitting at the controls of a quantum computer. I've got all my qubits (terms) all wired together in some complicated expression and when powe
370.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Counterpoint, object.next() was removed from python3 and replaced with next(object). It both modifies state and returns data. I really prefered next() as a method since it does change the state of a generator.
371.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Grepping the PKGBUILDs on Arch looks quite a bit different Official: 547 out of 5115 use cmake. Unofficial: 5167 out of 47069 use cmake. A lot of these offer plain Makefiles too, but cmake is decently popular and hard to dismiss.
372.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Hey Arch-folk! Top requests for AUR packages you'd like to see brought into the [community] repository? edit: Or previously unavailable software that should be in the AUR?
373.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
http://kmkeen.com/jshon/
374.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
I'm pretty sure any sort of practical space based radiator system would not use circulating coolant but would probably use heat pipes. No moving parts and for large systems you generally use many small pipes in parallel. Combine thes
375.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Scroll up, see kozikow's post about xcape.
376.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
If you use Emacs, I've heard great things about used xkb to remap spacebar to control, and using xcape to make control generate a space when tapped. It sounds messy but now you'll get emacs thumb instead of emacs pinky.
377.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
http://kmkeen.com/tmp/wikireader1.jpg Though it is a reflective LCD and text-only.
378.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
You are probably still playing the original Humble Bundle (or launch) version. Update that. A while ago they added a frame rate limit and power use is reasonable.
379.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
It is a library that works with any language, no need to learn a new one. Two people can even work on the same problem in different languages and seamlessly combine their work into one result.
380.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
It is a shame really. Declarative programming is so much simpler to think about and extremely powerful. I've been working on trying to make declarative programming more accessible and while I personally have seen 60x improvements in
381.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
> People want to be able to shut their door, and this interferes with the cross ventilation. Go back a little further (1850-1900-ish) and everyone had doors that look like http://makingitlovely.com/wp-content/upload
382.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
> The biggest problem is that there's no gradual migration process. Sure there is. The process is similar to all the WinXP to Linux migrations going on. The intermediary step to OS migration is cross-platform applications. The in
383.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
It was often hard to tell these features apart from up in the air. There are many instances of pilots losing races because they followed the wrong rail line. For a really in-depth history of pre-electronic navigation, check out "Most
384.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
They've probably fixed the possum thing by now :-) Your comment makes me wonder what a good pricepoint would be for such a system. How much money and how much space would you be willing to give up, for example. Less hypothetically, wh
385.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Okay, that is pretty awesome. Some thoughts... greens are probably optimal for this because they are fast to go from seed to produce. And 100% of the output can be sold, with basically no wastes. Singapore is also optimal for greenhouses
386.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
You need to spend the rest of the year pruning and training the canes to be harvester friendly. The harvester itself shakes and beats the berries off. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv-AnyvWL7g around 38 seconds in. Qual
387.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
Regarding greenhouses, any example you cite I can say is way out of economical norms ;-) But the only way to make organic work (without throwing away half the produce or drowning the field in the few allowable chemicals) is to either do i
388.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
> But as a software guy with an interest in salt-of-the-earth hobbies, I'd love to play with one. Like you said, high-tech outdoors is troublesome. If you want to get a head start on this sort of thing buy an outdoor robot chasis (
389.
▲
by
keenerd
13y ago
As someone who does farming (part time), I don't see these being practical. For low value bulk crops (corn, wheat, soybeans) the robot is too expensive and existing mechanization is too good. Even for high value stuff (grapes and oth
390.
▲
Practical use of SAT
(kmkeen.com)
3 points
by
keenerd
13y ago
|
0 comments
More ›