kdjdjdjfjsjd

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kdjdjdjfjsjd 27d ago

   This was meant complimentarily, mind you. KDE apps more often than not tend to land on the “so full of options with conflicting text hierarchy, icons and weird spacing rules” that opening a KDE app sometimes feels like a risking complete se
2. 2.▲
   by kdjdjdjfjsjd 27d ago

   Yes it really should. It’s much easier for users to identify what “Photos” does instead of “Koko”. It’s infinitely easier to identify at a glance what a “Files” app does versus “Nautilus”, same goes for “Epiphany” and “Browser”. Off-the-wal
3. 3.▲
   by kdjdjdjfjsjd 27d ago

   If I were to guess I’d say they went with Safari because of Internet Explorer that used to be the Mac’s default browser. In a safari tour you discover and explore, so keeping up with the discovery theme we have Internet >Explorer<, Ne
4. 4.▲
   by kdjdjdjfjsjd 27d ago

   Why even buy a thing that you currently don’t have a use for? And what does AI have to do with it at all?
5. 5.▲
   by kdjdjdjfjsjd 27d ago

   A decently looking KDE application? I’m proper amazed. (And I’m not even joking).