kashchei

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kashchei 13y ago

   > Systemd is an ecosystem. "Ecosystem" == vendor-managed closed system. True interoperability does not produce "an ecosystem", it produces standards with (at least potentially) multiple implementations. > It contai
2. 2.▲
   by kashchei 13y ago

   I see a pattern here. What guarantees that in ten years the same claims won't be made about systemd being pushed in 2014 "while not ready", but by 2023 all issues are ironed out after the whole thing was rewritten three times
3. 3.▲
   by kashchei 13y ago

   Also: just saying that something is a myth does not make it any less true. The whole point is that systemd (and Pulseaudio) is anti-Unix because its author does not understand Unix design, how would his opinion be of any value in this matte
4. 4.▲
   by kashchei 13y ago

   The design is still beyond horrible, and on par with Windows. If everything that can be shoehorned into a system and "works" despite being a complicated mess, was accepted, we would have adopted Windows registry and SNMP as primar
5. 5.▲
   by kashchei 13y ago

   I have to remind everyone that the author of systemd is Lennart Poettering, the guy behind Pulseaudio. I think, this is one "feature" that should outweigh all supposed benefits of this program. For those unfamiliar with Pulseaudio