kasajian

8 ms·

1.
by kasajian 2mo ago
Nah, you're just twisting things around. We are criticizing and calling out the rationale he's giving. Not even interested if he hears it. It's message to the public of the maintainers behavior. Not to him. He's g
2.
by kasajian 2mo ago
That b.s. It has to do with the fact that the project is not making it clear that it's not interested in PRs. Don't have Issues. Don't have PRs. Just push your code to github. Add to the README that this is a mirror of th
3.
by kasajian 2mo ago
He has a right to do anything he wants with hit source, but Open Source is nothing more than a license. We had GPL 2 before there was github. All you had to do is either deliver the source with your software, or make the source available
4.
by kasajian 6mo ago
Someone explain to me why this product is unique. If Mozilla never came out with it, does that mean businesses are stuck with using cloud-based AI? C'mon. There's a lot of products that already offer local-AI. What am I missin
5.
by kasajian 6mo ago
Content should be in a github org.
6.
by kasajian 9mo ago
I'll check back every few years to see if either this project, Wine or ReactOS can run Visual Studio 2026 (or 2022) and .NET Framework 4. Not talking about the cross-platform versions of .NET and VS-Code. I'm specifically talking
7.
New OS aims to provide (some) compatibility with macOS(github.com)
315 points by kasajian 11mo ago|165 comments
8.
by kasajian 11mo ago
Yes, but you are not giving people anyway to close their account, nor make it obvious to unsubscribe. That's not very good.
9.
by kasajian 1y ago
Yep, also Microsoft Dev Box: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/dev-box
10.
by kasajian 1y ago
The article wasn't proof-read. Too many basic English errors are too distracting and makes it hard to read.
11.
by kasajian 1y ago
I don't agree. I don't think of Oracle at all when I think of JavaScript. And I also don't care whether they own the trademark. There's no hypocrisy.
12.
by kasajian 1y ago
I don't get why this is so important. I don't love Oracle. I do love JavaScript. I couldn't care less who owns the trademark, and not sure what if anything would make me care.
13.
by kasajian 1y ago
Are you experiencing any perf issues when using "Blazor Server"?
14.
by kasajian 1y ago
The Popular Mechanics article talks about it as if it was just "discovered" Both the original blog post and the video linked from the article are 5+ years old. Not exactly news.
15.
by kasajian 1y ago
Since you mentioned SBCL, I thought this announcement about ECL and WebAssembly would be worth mentioning for those who are curious. It was announced just last month: https://ecl.common-lisp.dev/posts/Web-ECL-Grant-Ann
16.
Web ECL Grant Announcement(ecl.common-lisp.dev)
2 points by kasajian 1y ago|1 comments
17.
by kasajian 1y ago
Funny. I was just thinking about dismissing Clojure for a project I'm going to work on because I was concerned about it's lack of ability to work with async calls. I'm too used to how async in JavaScript and C#, and I&#x27
18.
Reverse engineering natively-compiled .NET apps(migeel.sk)
3 points by kasajian 1y ago|0 comments
19.
by kasajian 1y ago
The product with fewer features being recommended makes sense if they do those things well. The customer buying it is aware of the limitation, whereas the customer buying your unit getting a broken display is a disappointment. Maybe it was
20.
by kasajian 1y ago
Do View Source -- just take a look lol
21.
by kasajian 1y ago
I think you're assuming people who are thinking of going beyond the original "point" of edit missed that point. We didn't. We're looking new directions it can go.
22.
by kasajian 1y ago
why would the binary size be big to support this? Scintilla has been doing syntax color for decades -- it's pretty small.
23.
by kasajian 1y ago
I'm just waiting for this thing to turn into an IDE like Turbo C 2.0 ( https://imgur.com/5vyPZdO ) I don't see why this shouldn't turn into a sophisticated code editor. I get that that's not the goal, b
24.
by kasajian 1y ago
Not sure what the question is. The License is clearly stated.
25.
by kasajian 1y ago
Not your fault, but I'm curious how is it that in the last 10 years, you haven't heard of .NET running on Linux? And for the last three years, the resulting binaries can be pure native code not requiring a runtime.
26.
by kasajian 1y ago
I don't know if this is the case now, but about a decade ago, in order to report a Bug to Microsoft you had to create a Premier Support ticket, which cost $1000+, but free if it's a Bug. So basically, if what you report is not a
27.
by kasajian 1y ago
I wish there was a way to transpile this to C. That way it can be both an escape hatch, and a way to target unusual platforms not directly supported by C3 lang.
28.
by kasajian 1y ago
This seems a big silly. This is not a language issue. You can have a C++ library that does exactly all the things being shown here so that the application developer doesn't worry about. There would no C++ language features missing t
29.
by kasajian 1y ago
Even the first of Visual C++ was a professional C/C++ compiler. That's been the same Microsoft compiler they've been selling for years for $500. The previous version was just called Microsoft C/C++ 7.0. It wasn't
30.
by kasajian 1y ago
Clojure could never really be a thing since it ignores the most important rule: fast startup. Because of this, and for no other reason, Clojure will always be an "also ran". It's not about competency of the people working o

More ›