kasabali

24 ms·

361.
by kasabali 2y ago
So is X11, by that logic https://cyber.dabamos.de/unix/x11/
362.
by kasabali 2y ago
> nobody was putting the same energy he was to either offer better or stop it which was much easier thing to do, compared to an outsider, considering he was on Red Hat's payroll, along with the people (gnome/freedesktop crowd)
363.
by kasabali 2y ago
> because the user could use a chroot to replace /usr/lib with something different You need to be root in the first place to be able to do that
364.
by kasabali 2y ago
Same difference
365.
by kasabali 2y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
366.
by kasabali 2y ago
Sadly there's no "interaction" in blog posts
367.
by kasabali 2y ago
That's rude. You're not his therapist.
368.
by kasabali 3y ago
It's built on a recent Firefox codebase so it'd be heavy
369.
by kasabali 3y ago
> I wonder what their damage is. Torvalds' low opinion of on security researchers in general comes to mind.
370.
by kasabali 3y ago
They're available at https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/releases/ for linux and windows.
371.
by kasabali 3y ago
> JPEG has many years left still Such a shame arithmetic coding (which is already in the standard) isn't widely supported in the real world. Because converting Huffman coded images losslessly to arithmetic coding provides an easy
372.
by kasabali 3y ago
> hardware encoding and decoding for image formats is alive and well I keep hearing and hearing this but nobody has ever yet provided a concrete real world example of smart phones using hw decoding for displaying images.
373.
by kasabali 3y ago
I'm sure it's better now than 13 years ago, but the conclusion I got from looking at very recent published benchmark results is that lossy webp is still only slightly better than mozjpeg at low bitrates and still has worse max. PQ
374.
by kasabali 3y ago
"computation-intensive media" = videos Seriously, when is the last time mobile phones used hardware decoding for showing images? Flip phones in 2005? I know camera apps use hardware encoding but I doubt gallery apps or browsers bo
375.
by kasabali 3y ago
Probably this: https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/17/microsoft_ans_patent/ I think it would be much better for everyone involved and humanity if Mr. Duda himself got the patent in the first place instea
376.
by kasabali 3y ago
That's a very good point. At this rate of development I wouldn't be surprised if libjxl becomes x264 of image encoders. On the other hand, libvpx has always been a mediocre encoder which I think might be the reason for disappoint
377.
by kasabali 3y ago
I'm surprised mozjpeg performed worse than libjpeg-turbo at high quality settings. I thought its aim was having better pq than libjpeg-turbo at the expense of speed.
378.
by kasabali 3y ago
Sir please refrain from whataboutism
379.
by kasabali 3y ago
> shitting on Plex for no reason I thought the reason was obvious (it's the first word of first sentence of the parent comment)
380.
by kasabali 3y ago
Timestamp 14:43. Both mediatek, A710 is worse despite being on a better node. At 15:45, you can see they even managed to fuck up the little cores in that A510 has worse efficiency than A55.
381.
by kasabali 3y ago
> According to that thread, the hardest thing about an open source printer is the patents on all the hardware We've had printers 25 years ago, patents are hardly an excuse.
382.
by kasabali 3y ago
That's misleading. Multi process support was implemented in Firefox 48. XUL extension purge was in Firefox 57.
383.
by kasabali 3y ago
performance/watt is worse in A710 than in older A78 according to do tests done in the linked segment
384.
by kasabali 3y ago
Here's a more honest and direct introduction than Microsoft itself could wrote: https://forums.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=55358 Especially follow the YouTube links demonstrating the problem: https://www.you
385.
by kasabali 3y ago
Mozilla corp.'s misaligned priorities far predates drastically cutting down their engineering force.
386.
by kasabali 3y ago
transliteration of Greek "Αγία", to be more specific.
387.
by kasabali 3y ago
That's bcache, not bcachefs.
388.
by kasabali 3y ago
It isn't competing with Google on Blink development, it's simply adding support for the new JPEG image standard (which they're probably going to have as a system codec anyway in that case). Note that they've had HEVC pl
389.
by kasabali 4y ago
They bought CentOS in 2014 which was long before IBM.
390.
by kasabali 4y ago
yes

More ›