4 ms·

I'm surprised mozjpeg performed worse than libjpeg-turbo at high quality settings. I thought its aim was having better pq than libjpeg-turbo at the expense of s

I'm surprised mozjpeg performed worse than libjpeg-turbo at high quality settings. I thought its aim was having better pq than libjpeg-turbo at the expense of speed.

JyrkiAlakuijala 3y ago
It is consistent to what I have seen. Both in metrics and in eyeballing. Mozjpeg gives good results around quality 75, but less good at 90+++