kaoD

80 ms·

871.
by kaoD 9y ago
> looking at this giant UML diagram It's not an UML diagram. Looks more like an ad-hoc flow chart (unless I forgot a specific type of UML diagram that looks like this).
872.
by kaoD 9y ago
And that's why countries with higher government involvement spend less in healthcare and have better results.
873.
by kaoD 9y ago
GCM has an integrity check built in, which is very useful in crypto. https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/2310/what-is-the-... https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/14747/gcm-v
874.
by kaoD 9y ago
> it's too precise or constricted What do you expect from Western classical music? ;)
875.
by kaoD 9y ago
I find your links completely soulless and unimaginative (mostly rehashing 80s black music) so to each their own I guess :) Not that I dislike them, they're just... plain (to me). I really like Todd Terje, which you linked, but I wouldn
876.
by kaoD 9y ago
Could it be that you're uneducated (which is fine, there's so much music produced nowadays that's hard to be educated in all niches) and listening to shitty electronic music that the mainstream industry is advertising endless
877.
by kaoD 9y ago
Kids don't want to be Mark Zuckerberg. They want to be Wiz Khalifa or Nicki Minaj.
878.
by kaoD 9y ago
IMHO there will not be a next Miles Davies or a next Jimmy Hendrix. Or rather, they've already been. The last 40 years of music have experienced such a revolution, we've already had many of those (most of them relegated to obscuri
879.
by kaoD 9y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=web+crypto+api
880.
by kaoD 9y ago
match some_int { // Why not Some(& s) => ... ??? Some(ref s) => println!("{}",s), None => unreachable!() } To me his proposed syntax looks like the exact contrary use case: pa
881.
by kaoD 9y ago
I'd say more like "this tiny [latest] block is a strong proof of history".
882.
by kaoD 9y ago
A simple counter-example comes to mind: rewriting history is trivial only if you want no central authority. Even if we lose the "decentralized consensus" aspect with no PoW, it still can be advantageous. E.g.: simply having an aut
883.
by kaoD 9y ago
The method takes the result modulo 10, so numbers can repeat (but not more than than ~ p/10 times).
884.
by kaoD 9y ago
Fair enough.
885.
by kaoD 9y ago
How else can they profile me in a brand new job, in a brand new Windows installation, in Firefox, if I'm not logged in? The organization I work for has a lot of different job types and we're all proxied through the same external I
886.
by kaoD 9y ago
Not at all. I'm not logged in to my Google account at my day job and I still got relevant search results when I arrived. DDG wouldn't after months of use at home.
887.
by kaoD 9y ago
Nanosecond resolution multiplies the brute force effort by 10^9, which is negligible.
888.
by kaoD 9y ago
> If you seed with nanoseconds it'll be a lot harder. Not really. Or rather, a lot of zero is zero.
889.
by kaoD 9y ago
This allows computers cut off from the internet to be infected too. Juicy and the risk is minimal.
890.
by kaoD 9y ago
Yes, but that wasn't GPs line of reasoning. Even if it doesn't apply in this case it's valid criticism that you can't just attribute to hindsight.
891.
by kaoD 9y ago
I think the article has a point. How is the principle of least privilege hindsight?
892.
by kaoD 9y ago
Indeed. As far as I can tell they are like what used to be Service Packs? E.g.: I didn't install the so-called Creators Update so I'm not in the latest Windows 10 version. I'm no Windows sysadmin though so I'm not really
893.
by kaoD 9y ago
Here's the complete process I followed: 1. Search for "windows smb server vuln" in Google. 2. "Microsoft Security Bulletin MS17-010 - Critical"[0] is the link I'm looking for. 3. Search for your version in the
894.
by kaoD 9y ago
Go to your Windows Update History and check if you have KB4013429 installed. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4013429/windows-10-... EDIT: Or KB4012606 / KB4013198 for older Windows builds.
895.
by kaoD 9y ago
I wasn't referring to physicians, the NHS wasn't patient zero.
896.
by kaoD 9y ago
And isn't 2 months enough for that? Also... images? :^) I think you're giving too much credit to the sysadmins in these organizations (and I talk from experience, can't say more).
897.
by kaoD 9y ago
It's literally as easy as installing a Windows update organization-wide. What is there to test? These aren't servers. These are workstations of common workers. Windows desktops mostly used for spreadsheets and playing solitaire. I
898.
by kaoD 9y ago
You can reimage the workstations but how much work has been lost? Probably an awful lot. I can't even fathom how many spreadsheets with no backup have been lost today. WRT backups... :^)
899.
by kaoD 9y ago
According to Spain's CCN-CERT it's spreading through a remote code execution vulnerability in Windows' SMB Server, affecting pretty much all versions of Windows. https://www.ccn-cert.cni.es/seguridad-al-dia&#x
900.
by kaoD 9y ago
Per computer. If the ransomware has no vulns itself, this is going to be a hit to economy, either by paying the ransom (it's already hit some major companies) or the losses produced by it.

More ›