Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kaoD
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
481.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> Whoever solves this problem will probably get to be the new google I bet it's something as easy as "derank pages with ads". Now you just need a business model to support that.
482.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Well, that's because mailing lists are terrible.
483.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
As I was reading the post I assumed (1) happened because something better came and completely replaced computers: magic, raw energy manipulation, biomachines, hextech... something like that.
484.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> You also need their dataset. With the training code you can fine tune the model with your own dataset, which exactly fits FSF's freedom 1.
485.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
That's what I meant when I said the open source term kinda got obsolete. With AI the model is the program. I don't even have the training code or the checkpoint so I cannot modify it as the freedom 1 requires. As I see it the weig
486.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
I know what free software is. I meant the checkpoint might be redistributable after you ask for it (but I doubt so). Hard to tell since you have to ask to get it, but I'm pretty sure you'll get it with a pretty restrictive license
487.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> All you have to do is ask. That makes it literally not open source. Can I redistribute it freely? I don't think so, I might be wrong. If not, it's not open source. > and you still complain? But I don't complain about
488.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Going back to my original comment: if I release a giant binary blob (say, a Windows image) and an open source runtime to run it (say, VirtualBox), does that mean I can say Windows is open source? I don't think so, and to me it seems th
489.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
It feels like open source as a term became obsolete(-ish). Is it open source (in spirit) if only the inference code is open source? I mean, technically it might be, but not being able to train it myself is basically against FSF's freed
490.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> and see if I started to be able to recognize the randomart images in the way the manual implies I'd be able to, and it turns out it worked! How computationally expensive is it to generate a key with randomart that kinda-resembles
491.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
In what way is scalability and high availability not part of Postgres' core?
492.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Not sure if understand what you mean. If we see every field as f(x,y,z,t) what do you mean you can't "change" x,y,z without changing t? If you mean changing the x,y,z argument values, you can (you're just evaluating a di
493.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Funny thing is according to Wikipedia David Guetta coined the term so... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_rave
494.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> nobody is releasing training code Interesting. Why is this happening?
495.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> What Stallman calls Open Source is what the rest of the world calls Source Available That's absolutely wrong, as clearly explained in the article I linked to.
496.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
I don't think it's a naming problem, I think libre software has been under direct attack on a similar angle to "embrace, extend and extinguish". But yeah I agree naming doesn't help. I'm biased because in my
497.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
That's a great comment to prove my point on how software freedom is completely absent from public discourse :) I'll let Stallman speak for me: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point....
498.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
As I see it open source killed free software. We don't need open source, we need free software. Stallman was right, as he always is with these things. It's a meaningful distinction and the fact that open source mindshare won is wh
499.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
I just tried it. Jan 9 version. Got the same response as OP. I included the question about tennis balls first, wondering if that makes a difference. EDIT: tried on a fresh conversation and it guessed correctly. Interesting.
500.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Code is copyrightable, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design It might not be patentable, except it is under some jurisdictions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent
501.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Might be useful for non-browser VMs? E.g. a microcontroller running WASM.
502.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
If you offload graphics to the GPU (which is what shaders are), there's surprisingly little CPU work left in a 2D platformer game. Think of (fragment) shaders as programs that run in the GPU per-texture-pixel. There is some initial CPU
503.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
I suspect its fitness function was not only explicitly rewarding lefty rants, but also punishing righty rants.
504.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Unless I misunderstood you, the article directly contradicts your point: > Password managers [...] In this case, however, the user is on both endpoints and is the only person with a key.
505.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Android One being seemingly abandoned is such a pity. My best phone every was an Android One (Mi A2 Lite).
506.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
What parent means is that you won't have any bound checks on array access, just a len(arr) loop.
507.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
Named closing tags are good when manually writing stuff because it reduces the opportunity for errors.
508.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
It's global thermonuclear war. There won't be internet, cell reception, or even a power grid. The radio in those is pretty short distance (ham can do 1000s of Km) and they draw a lot of power that you'll want to save since (i
509.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
This is the only thing that makes me want to learn radio. I don't want to buy expensive gear, but being able to build my own DIY QRP (low-power) DX (long-distance) CW (Morse) transceiver? Count me in. Too bad there doesn't seem to
510.
▲
by
kaoD
4y ago
> Also this is called "крокозябры" (read: kro-ko-zya-bry In Esperanto there's krokodili[0] (literally "to crocodile") which is used to describe speaking non-Esperanto among esperantists. This was further adapted
More ›