kamaludu

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   You're right, starting with that context would have helped. It's an experimental project and of course there will be imperfections, whether written by me or with LLM assistance. I did my best.
2. 2.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   For ethical principles I 100% agree with you. I used LLMs to generate parts of the code, but the architecture, integration, debugging and testing are mine. It took me months in my free time. So, what can I say to be 100% honest?
3. 3.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   Nice! your project use smaller components (do one thing and do it well), bash4llm is more monolithic because I focus Bash-only portability and security. different approach for similar ideas, I see your repo, thank you!
4. 4.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   English idioms are hard for me (I'm Italian), so I can misunderstand your point. bash4llm is long because it uses pure Bash, and making Bash-only reasonably safe and consistent for LLM calls it's difficult. For me, that's exa
5. 5.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   I've applied a set of corrections, on Bash4LLM core, to reduce redundancy and make the flow more deterministic. Optimized safe_mkdir to eliminate superfluous calls to chmod, simplify temp file management by removing a redundant pre‑val
6. 6.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   Thank you very much for your attention and for your time. The problems that you have seen are real. Inspired by your feedback, I proceed to work on it, and I will fix the hollow redundancies and the bad duplications.
7. 7.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   I don't think it is of poor quality. I post this because I wish it is good for others. It's not auto generated, I made this.
8. 8.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   I don't think , I can pay if it's really good for this work, but I've seen the characteristics of pay plan and are not really better for my use case. The free plan is not the reason for the code size; the architecture is the
9. 9.▲
   by kamaludu 3mo ago

   I work with termux on Android, and it works fine. For now, I've not tested bash4llm on other environments, but I think it does work because the required packages are the minimum common denominator for all environments, ad with this req
10. 10.▲
    by kamaludu 3mo ago

    The macro sections/sections/sub-sections in the code are not random, I intentionally decide that. In brief: PRECORE_BOOT - for initialization PRECORE_RUN - persistency, history, cache PROVIDER - embedded provider (groq) CORE_SETUP
11. 11.▲
    by kamaludu 3mo ago

    Architecture and structure are my decisions, LLM are instruments, simple executors, today i think are commonly used. Write code with LLM is not "push a button", it's a technical way of work, needs study and practice. 5k lines
12. 12.▲
    by kamaludu 3mo ago

    Yes, the code is big and bulky, i know. But i am a single person, not a team. I write simple and clear for me, because i need to mantain it. Only Bash, zero dependencies, i like this. thank you for your comment!
13. 13.▲
    by kamaludu 3mo ago

    well, i write Bash4LLM to be: . Portable - You need only: bash, coreutils, findutils, util-linux, gawk, curl, jq. No Python (slow), no Node (heavy), no Golang (need too many binaries, one for each OS, hard to maintain for one single perso
14. 14.▲
    Show HN: Bash4LLM+ – A lightweight, dependency-free Bash wrapper for LLM APIs(github.com)

    60 points by kamaludu 3mo ago|26 comments
15. 15.▲
    Show HN: GroqBash – Single‑File Bash Client for Groq API(github.com)

    1 points by kamaludu 8mo ago|0 comments