kakapupu

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   > The right applications depend on the exact problem, and even problems that are not a fit can be re-stated so that they become good enough for Redis, and similarly, problems that in theory are a great fit can be mis-implemented easily
2. 2.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   > it is not about the government being objectively awful, it is about the government regulating. Well, the government is no more awful than any other Mafia. Think about it. If you don't pay protection money / taxes , you get
3. 3.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   > they can use government to actually offset the power that corporations have (through plain capital and through regulatory capture) You're saying people can "use" the government to compensate for the government itself p
4. 4.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   So using the word "psychopath" is "offensive" or something? :D Give me a break.
5. 5.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   Nice how "working together" is an euphemism for having a bunch of rulers enslave everyone else "for the common good" :)
6. 6.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   > Defined by a standard How does this help, compared to Clojure? > Multiple mature implementations Why wouldn't one free mature implementation be good enough? > Wholeheartedly multi-paradigm Exactly like Clojure. > "Li
7. 7.▲
   by kakapupu 10y ago

   > I do not understand. I thought that in the current climate, where people are becoming increasingly aware and concerned about privacy, that such laws would be expanded in scope. It's very simple. The government is not working tow