Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kadoban
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
211.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Speakers work well if they're set up well, maintained well and used correctly. Most drive thrus sound like shit because none of those are true.
212.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> There’s a 48GB B60 already Kind of. It's more two 24gb b60s in a trenchcoat. It connects to one slot but it's two completely separate gpus and requires the board to support pcie bifurcation.
213.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Okay. I'd happily believe that, it doesn't contradict what I said. The quote you have from me is from this context: > There's a lot of money and effort spent in satisfying the sexual desires of (predominantly straight) men
214.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
You can install koreader pretty easily. It's way better than their built in reader.
215.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
I don't think that this is the only factor, I just suspect that it is _a_ factor.
216.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
There's a lot of money and effort spent in satisfying the sexual desires of (predominantly straight) men. There's not typically quite as much interest in doing the same for women. For example I've been looking at models and l
217.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> Poor man’s version of this which requires no training would be to evaluate positions at low depth and high depth and select positions where the best move switches. I've looked at the ~same problem in go instead of chess quite a bi
218.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
That's just a solid hack to avoid having to have a custom widget. Well done, random engineer.
219.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
It's an _insanely_ powerful signal. It'd be like watching for fireflies in a field and suddenly seeing a stick of dynamite go off.
220.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Misleading? Maybe, I don't think so though. "Extraterrestrial" is just "not from/on Earth", it means nothing beyond that.
221.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
It will be a scammer's wonderland as tens of thousands with little understanding of what they need to set up have no trusted, competent person to help.
222.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Yeah, that makes sense if you just have ~proof that some configuration works and want to just be done with it.
223.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Threadripper very rarely seems to make any sense. The only times it seems like you want it are for huge memory support/bandwidth and/or a huge number of pcie slots. But it's not cheap or supported enough compared to epyc to r
224.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> If you got food poisoning from a restaurant, would you recommend it to your friends? After all, food-borne pathogens and poor hygiene are just a fact of life. There are standard practices that avoid the vast majority of food poisoning.
225.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Any evidence that that is how LLMs were taught? It doesn't match the moderate amount of info I know about their training in general.
226.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Cranks/scammers can not in general be trusted to honor bets, that tends to be a waste of time.
227.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
The suggested change wouldn't affect functionality or the effect. It just tells the browser that there's a thing around the changing part with a fixed size that can't possibly change layout of anything around it, to the user
228.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
It could _probably_ figure out a lot of cases via some kind of static or runtime analysis. Like the example from the linked article, there's one animation involved essentially and if the browser does the hard work for the entire length
229.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
I am curious how these work for people with common kinds of colorblindness. The author mentions at the end that they likely don't work for that case, but they don't seem to have spent much time thinking about it. Would it be possi
230.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Intel is a huge contributor to linux, yeah. Drivers and way more have been done there, and I doubt all of that has dried up.
231.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Sure, especially consider if singularities are not real. Then what's inside the event horizon is just some bunch of unknown material in some actual shape. Why wouldn't it be? If singularities are real...same thing but more boring
232.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
The people around me are people, they're not a representative sample of anthropologists though (now or decades ago). That logic just doesn't work.
233.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
Is it me or is it odd that that first paper doesn't seem to cite any source for the misconception they're trying to argue against? I don't see any cites for people who believed that boiling could not happen in fragile contain
234.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> That has been known since at least the 1990s with TD-Gammon beating the world champions in Backgammon. Yeah, I didn't mean to imply that reinforcement learning (or applying it in this way) is novel. It was just important to work o
235.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
A human can easily struggle at solving a poorly communicated puzzle, especially if paper/pencil or something isn't available to convert to a better format. LLMs can look back at what they wrote, but it seems kind of like a poor fo
236.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> But the resolution there was MCTS MCTS wasn't _really_ the solution to go. MCTS-based AIs existed for years and they weren't _that_ good. They weren't superhuman for sure, and the moves/games they played were kind o
237.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> And this is perfectly ok for the planet, it doesn’t give a single fck about us mere humans It's not great for us humans though, pretty sure most people care about that more than the planet being happy or unhappy.
238.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> And give rise to others as it has done so all along. Too bad for the billions who are suddenly in the wrong place to survive.
239.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> Climate advocates in general try to avoid implying that we've already crossed a threshold, as that breeds hopelessness. None of that means it's not true. Who is left to take decisive and ambitious action in say, the next deca
240.
▲
by
kadoban
1y ago
> Does it have any import on real algorithms? As-in algorithms you'll care about if you're a programmer and not overly interested in theory? Not really, no.
More ›