Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kadoban
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
571.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Mostly just significant in terms of distance. If it's deeper, it's farther away and you'll feel it less.
572.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Or it's a tech-literate journalist who knows that usually it's the latter and they have vague plans to transition to the former later.
573.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
> Also you might find this normal but I cannot imagine my female colleagues being amused at me calling one of them up asking to “consult” about a name solely because she’s a woman. I'd certainly hope it wouldn't be "solely
574.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Yeah maybe the shareware, but I'm not sure what the license is on that either. It's free to play, sure, but is it free to use the assets for whatever you feel like and redistribute on your website? At a guess: no.
575.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Doom is still under copyright protection last I knew. The source is GPL, but have the assets ever been liberally licensed? I think they're more abandonware. I'm sure you could still do it, but personally I try to respect copyright
576.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Some of the books are _definitely_ different than others. In whole, the universe can be seen as somewhat troubling as well, but the vast majority is quite optimisitic. The majority of the universe that is, bad things still do happen in the
577.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers, the Culture series, and Vorkosigan Saga Sci Fi does tend to be bleak, these are the ones I can think of.
578.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
> Even with 10k codes (2 days) you get dozens of duplicates, so I'd say it's potentially even more common. Yeah I screwed up here, at the end: > Sqrt of a million is a thousand, and if they're every 30 seconds, that
579.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Is your point that this action is some sort of direct democratic process and thus problematic? I'm having trouble finding any other reading of what you're saying. But it isn't, this is a bill working its way through the state
580.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
In what way is this not the democratic process? It's a law under consideration in a state. Is Connecticut not a democracy?
581.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Can't you just look up the IP in rDNS? You definitely can, I just tried, but it's not 100% clear to me if you can keep a name out of there if you try. I don't think you can, I mean DNS is public.
582.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
This is the birthday paradox. The rough approximation is you need sqrt(n) values to get to a 50% chance of having a duplicate. Sqrt of a million is a thousand, and if they're every 30 seconds, that's ~8 hours or so. So you probabl
583.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Domain names aren't secret, that doesn't sound very reassuring.
584.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Every season in The Wire is a mix of new and old groups of characters (except the first of course). Is s2 really notably extra focused on s1 characters? If it is I didn't notice, though I can't say I've counted either.
585.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
> I’m biased since it’s the most boring season by far That season has really grown on me over time and rewatches. It has a lot of great character work on Omar, Avon, Stringer, McNulty, Prezbo, Freeman, etc.; Ziggy, Nick, Sobotka is peak
586.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Names are not generally considered secret. It will be relatively easy for someone to social engineer the name for a room either with the desk or with you (calling the room).
587.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
This is about a PDF reader though, not Google Scholar itself.
588.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Yeah, I don't see any inherent reason why you couldn't use wind/water/geothermal/solar energy and then electricity to get as far up the tech tree as you like. Or just some other form of chemical energy. Some of the
589.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
This article has more detail on what looks edited: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-68534289 For the circle in the article here, look at the skin on hand there, it kind of fades into fabric. And something looks wrong with t
590.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
The nuance here is that the best _proven_ lower bound is n^2. ~Everybody suspects that the real lower bound is higher, but nobody seems to know how to prove it.
591.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Originally MCTS did have randomness, yes. I think the article mentions it, but this came in in the form of playouts at the end, used just to evaluate positions. This has been replaced in current similar projects by NN evaluations, which are
592.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
> Who is “we”? Language is cultural and context-specific. Not everyone has to agree, but if you talk to software people about "open source" and don't mean what everybody else means, you're just going to confuse and an
593.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
> But my main point is that it’s unreasonable to take two existing words and claim it’s impossible to combine them directly. There's terms that if you attempt to use the literal meaning of the component words, you'll confuse pe
594.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
> FSF/OSI traditionally reassign the meaning in their own scope and have a process of approval, probably for a good reason. Also some people will resist and blame you for being “misleading” with your “open source”. But you definitel
595.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
I checked several dictionaries and none had that usage. It's at _best_ very awkwardly worded. It's probably just a mistake.
596.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
No. Random just means you can't predict what value will be chosen, but doesn't tell you how likely different values are. If I roll a 12-sided die, that's random. If I roll two 6-sided dice and add the result, that's also
597.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
Anyone have a recent fork to grab from before it becomes harder to find?
598.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
It's pretty hard not to have _some_ capacity to have puddles or pockets of some sort. If nothing else, you can have infiltrates and cavities in rocks or ice, or pools/puddles/lakes on top of frozen areas.
599.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
The last person who figured out we were doing incomplete math is the single most famous scientist in the history of the world. Being the next one isn't more exciting than getting some particle named after yourself?
600.
▲
by
kadoban
3y ago
I can deduce the disk's shape without even hitting it. It's a disk.
More ›