Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kadendogthing
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
Glad someone else linked this! I tried submitting it to HN but it didn't gain much traction.
32.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>There's no such thing as dangerous information There most certainly is. We actively codify for it in most societies in a myriad of ways. See: Nuclear technology secrets, CDC protocols, and the fact that things like PTSD exist. And
33.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
Ironically, this should be a great gateway for Microsoft to heavily invest in a completely open browser. It would ruin Google's decade long plan.
34.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>I've noticed that Elon Musk's projects often start off in the wrong direction, but evolve in a way that works ultimately. With butt loads of public money?
35.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
> Human nature dictates this. > This is pretty standard human behavior, and it's why we have a whole host of laws and ethics regulations attempting to correct for it in both private and public organizations. That's not cynic
36.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>and possibly a tad inappropriate to assume that the commenter shares your cynicism and is coming from the same place. Your ascribed motivations to my outlook on this matter are not appreciated. It is plenty sufficient to look at his act
37.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
You would love it because you know it in practice doesn't do anything. Human nature dictates this. If they actually acted on their critiques you wouldn't be friends for long. We all do this to varying degrees in our personal and p
38.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
> They think it matters a lot more than it does We have pretty significant evidence over the last decade indicating otherwise. The RAND institute did an entire paper about it. >If the politicians are persuaded that any of this matters
39.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
I noticed you still could not address the negations to your original claims, and instead decided to call other people childish because you did not like the critique being levied at you. Definitely the sign of a mature adult. >You have no
40.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>He walked up to them. That's not aggression. Don't be stupid. >Because you disagree with what they were protesting, they had no right to be there? I never said they didn't have the right. Where did I say that? But allo
41.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>When you look at the full video, it was the Native American who was confrontational. Absolutely false. This was a group of students who were using their free time to protest the reproductive rights of others, and in the midst of doing t
42.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
NPR, BBC, Reuters, PBS, C-SPAN. You may have also heard of the Associated Press. You know what would be REALLY neat? Like it'd absolutely tickle my pickle? For people trying to blandly "both sides" this to provide substantial
43.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
> most large media groups are propaganda tools for their own political side No, most "large media groups" are not.
44.
▲
Facebook refuses to delete fake Pelosi video spread by Trump supporters
(theguardian.com)
17 points
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
|
4 comments
45.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
These games tend to be about 30 minutes in length and can be quite tedious. It's not exactly like firing up another game and getting through a few games in about 20 minutes. It's extremely involved.
46.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>either, unless "anywhere cool" happens to be on the transit route and you're going there Most urban areas are where actually legit "nifty"/cool/worthwhile restaurants/attractions/parks/e
47.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>Being free from public transport timetables and the ability to go anywhere on a whim are so precious. You can't do that with cars though at any time. Because there is traffic and parking spaces to deal with. Unless you're only
48.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
Not to mention all the tax dollars suburban/rural homes take from city centers to subsidize their "cheap" housing.
49.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>but what legal framework are you are using to treat this particular human-machine interaction differently without introducing a whole new class of liability for humans and traditional manufacturers? Humans are not robots?
50.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
He was always like this. Wealth didn't change anything.
51.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
Why did this get flagged?
52.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>They just moved to more obscure places, where they can continue and be evem more motivated Citation needed.
53.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>can't it all be automated? Yes, but two things. Airplane technology advances happen slowly but surely. Small changes can have big consequences when flying. So rightfully any changes are thought about for a long time until they'
54.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
> Is the wholesale dismissal of complex ideas based on a simplistic claim something to be held up as a standard to work towards? They're not really that complex. And you kind find all sorts of apologetics for the viewpoint, but ther
55.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>asking for substantiations of claims is becoming on HN This is a really shitty e-debate tactic. If you have something to say, say it. Pointing out that other people are quoting well-known bankrupt ideas doesn't justify having a bas
56.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>Have you read the book? Yep. I even have the hard copy. Have had it since I was 15. >but nothing in the book describes how people act? Nothing original. But more often than not it often misapplies grounded social or civil concepts th
57.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
>It's rare that I get to quote Atlas Shrugged I mean there's not really anything applicable in the book to reality or how people act.
58.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
What are one-dimensional business people actually good at? Besides just being a piece in the system that soaks up resources?
59.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
In the same way that eating raw meat has "different risks" than eating cooked meat.
60.
▲
by
kadendogthing
7y ago
It IS blog spam. The article doesn't say anything besides "everything sucks." There is not a single constructive point being made besides some fantasy world where our tools are drop dead gorgeous and the build pipelines are w
More ›