6 ms·
>either, unless "anywhere cool" happens to be on the transit route and you're going there Most urban areas are where actually legit "nifty"/cool/worthwhile res
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>either, unless "anywhere cool" happens to be on the transit route and you're going there
Most urban areas are where actually legit "nifty"/cool/worthwhile restaurants/attractions/parks/etc are (for a reason). The latter is often positioned on the former. Feel free to map highly rated (even highly rated AND expensive restaurants) restaurants in proximity to public transit areas for a quick example. It's not an accident.
>When I first moved to SF,
I don't think comparing the public transportation of a city notorious for its NIMBYism and catering to one particular class of society is a good idea. Certainly no one has ever used SF as an example of a metro that has good public transportation.
- yellowapple 7y ago> I don't think comparing the public transportation of a city notorious for its NIMBYism and catering to one particular class of society is a good idea Why not? It's a realistic example, and it seems like a lot of American cities have similar problems. It's fine to speculate on how much better the world would be in an ideal universe with robust mass transit and spherical cows, but right now we're talking about the actual cost of living differences in actual cities.