k4l3

5 ms·

1.
by k4l3 5y ago
Maybe I'm being willfully naive, but isn't the violence of today the reason why? You don't want to give extremists ready access to more detailed targeting information than they already have. Having never aimed a rocket before
2.
by k4l3 6y ago
I think it's totally fine, and probably preferable, for people to go back and forth. Absolutely in favor of it. I just also think they should recuse themselves from an investigation when those whom they've had significant dealings
3.
by k4l3 6y ago
That'd be great. Seriously though, why is that the case? If she's a public servant, she could donate her time to talks easily. When you're being paid that much money to speak, then are asked to sit in judgment on this company
4.
by k4l3 6y ago
> In fact, criticism of the two studies has woven a damning tapestry of Twitter threads and blog posts pointing out flaws of the studies—everything from basic math errors to alleged statistical sloppiness and sample bias Unless I'm
5.
by k4l3 6y ago
If the poorest in society can no longer buy food or medicine, the problem becomes very medical very quickly.
6.
by k4l3 8y ago
I agree with your assessment that it's impractical to meltdown reactors just to learn how to clean them up, but apparently the US government didn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BORAX_experiments
7.
by k4l3 9y ago
Completely agree. The lack of anything between Socrates and Copernicus alone shows the distinct bias of the list. Not a single Scholastic? No mention of achievements outside of hard science or mathematics. If the author specified that as hi
8.
by k4l3 11y ago
Good call on the actual price. Still 1/13th the current cost of the not-yet-operational ITER... Makes me wonder if the stellerator concept will be more feasible in the long run.