jydarche

4 ms·

1.
by jydarche 12y ago
So, many certificate authorities will need to re-issue certificates?
2.
by jydarche 13y ago
But, they prohibit the copy of the content from the website, no matter the way you did it. Point 5.2: "Except as expressly stated on the Website, you are not entitled to copy, publish, download, modify and redistribute the information
3.
by jydarche 13y ago
The facts are not copyrightable. http://www.lib.umich.edu/copyright/facts-and-data But there's probably a violation of the terms of use, so maybe it's not a good idea to say to everybody that you take the dat
4.
by jydarche 13y ago
Am I the only one thinking that the results are pretty bad (yeah I know, one week only). But, what I understand: no user engagement, bad questions, not enough answers. Nice idea, but what this metrics says to me is: time to pivot.
5.
by jydarche 13y ago
Nice work. It seems that you can only search by entering the first name. It will be cool to search with last name only. For the players pictures, did you think about the potential legal problem?
6.
by jydarche 13y ago
We can't expect such association when the biggest internet companies in America (Google, Facebook, Yahoo...) clearly don't care about privacy. It's all about money. Google don't be evil? FAIL
7.
by jydarche 13y ago
Up now for me.
8.
by jydarche 13y ago
For those who have the problem, you're automatically redirected to this page when acceding facebook.com.
9.
by jydarche 13y ago
Me too, first time this happens to me. Did you see this often?
10.
by jydarche 13y ago
In this case, can they take actions for blocking the website? It seems like a more logical solution to me.