jxurueydyys

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jxurueydyys 6y ago

   It reduces the attack surface to places that have been verified to be following security obligations. Otherwise a physical attack becomes much easier because you just need to work at an auto-shop that doesn't pay much attention to you.
2. 2.▲
   by jxurueydyys 6y ago

   The difference is that the pc is exposed to everything it interacts with including the internet while the car would only be interacting with shops that were meeting their certification obligations. Tying updates to physical locations also r
3. 3.▲
   by jxurueydyys 6y ago

   An easy solution would be to not allow self driving or remotely updated cars until there's a reliable solution to this. People already go to auto-shops for repairs, certified auto-shops could easily double as places to update software
4. 4.▲
   by jxurueydyys 6y ago

   This is a really lazy criticism considering they never specified which side they were talking about. WW2 is a good example because most Americans have some general knowledge of the subject to help them understand the topic compared to other