Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jwpapi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Does anyone use a trackpoint and has still compared to this? I get it’s faster then reaching to mouse, but faster then trackpoint?
62.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
If you estimate 10k salary per engineer that means the moment it’s cheaper for them to hire another engineer but that doesn’t mean it’s improving productivity 15% but if 15% is the moment it stopped being better than another human we can as
63.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Ragebait god
64.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Because it doesn’t work without me
65.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Such a fantasy, it leads to two problems. Increased complexity of your systems. Increased pipelines of your system. You might reduce the likelihood of errors, but at an overproportinal cost of time it takes to complete (which some might arg
66.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
It was challenging for me as well, but my pace and level is now that I use it for these cases at the moment: New language, infrastructure, general level of understanding of something I barely have an idea of. Rubber duck debugging, if i don
67.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
I see you trying really hard to make things right and are everywhere in the comment. I feel a bit bad in formulating my comments a bit polemical. Also my highest respect for responding so calmly without lowering your debating level to mine.
68.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Now what percentage of the 200$ have been used on the useful stuff and how much on exploration or other stuff. How long would it taken you to do it yourself? How much longer will the next task take you, compared to when you would’ve written
69.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Unfortunately Simon drank from the AI Cool Aid. I know everything you’ve done for the tech community, but I please you to take some time off and reflect on this article. It’s not on par with ur usual level, but the tendency has been visible
70.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
You kind of got it right, but the biggest loser of them all are the investors especially the index investors. They don’t even decide what they invest in but the savings that goes in funds need to invest in these stocks. It’s quite an elabor
71.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
I have to give them kudos. This whole thing is the greatest swindle of all time. AI has some use cases, but not at the price it’s currently priced at. I’ve been on AI since GPT-2 with a lot of heavy users. Every user has the same story, cur
72.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
The greatest part of this approach is that you actually become better in the process. The downside is you use less tokens.
73.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
We have AI radio station for years? All the algorithms perform better than the general models though. I’ve not listened to a radio station for years. No offense :/
74.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Because they don’t have an incentive to maximize your usage, but rather focus on solving probabilistic solvable problems for you. Bigger harnesses need to balance upping your token usage and being helpful.
75.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
That happened to my project as well. The main issue hasn’t beet that ai couldn’t solve the problem, but it became so slow and you need more and more verification layers and CI/CD that at one point you wish a simpler codebase back, with
76.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Ulnar Nerve Entrapement :/
77.
▲
by
jwpapi
4mo ago
Please give me some book recommendations :)
78.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
It’s still 400k more lines
79.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
How life feels not using bun
80.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
This will go down in history as the biggest mistake of software engineering of all time. Bun is the runtime of Claude Code, which is the core product of a trillion dollar company, which now sits on a vibe-coded app, where not a single perso
81.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
I own the domain govern.eu I didn‘t yet have a good idea on how to utilize it, open to ideas.
82.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
I really like this question: If you could wish for a codebase, which codebase would you wish for? If you think a second on that question, you’ll realize you probably not wishing for a super feature-rich one, but an easy to understand one, q
83.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
Obviously this is all my fault and others might have a better jugdement when using it. I’m just sharing my experience compared to the promises you easily might believe reading X/HN/Anthropic. I still have a lot of usage for AI: Ex
84.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
That’s the same story I had. The swindle goes like this, AI on a good codebase can build a lot of features, you think it’s faster it even seems safer and more accurate on times, especially in domains you don’t know everything about. This go
85.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
https://x.com/bcherny/status/2052126079176093967
86.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
I meant the developers motivation with "whiny baby" and I take the point that this was over the top and I could’ve found better words. But I meant that my comment is "politics-based and not technical", because the gut f
87.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
I meant my comment not the rewrite
88.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
Thank you put my gut feeling that I had in my top comment here in words. I didn’t have the full explanation ready, why this threw me off.
89.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
Jarreds Twitter is a Claude Code Billboard
90.
▲
by
jwpapi
5mo ago
> I am so tired of worrying about & spending lots of time fixing memory leaks and crashes and stability issues There are legit reasons to rewrite a program in a better fitting language, but as a runtime to be "tired of worrying
More ›