juve1996

19 ms·

211.
by juve1996 4y ago
Apple will destroy you regardless, they're a megacorp. If the software is good but only on windows they'll just make their own.
212.
by juve1996 4y ago
> I also don't think the author is genuinely claiming there's a conspiracy here. So the author calls it a "cover up." A "Great" cover-up. But he's not really saying it's a cover-up? Either outcome
213.
by juve1996 4y ago
For every random "expert" who is right there are likely millions of wrong ones. In tech terms, it's like the "idea" guy. We need to have some level of curation, that yes, will be wrong at singular time points. The p
214.
by juve1996 4y ago
People don't bother saving things they have in abundance.
215.
by juve1996 4y ago
Are there examples of US media saying it was a revolution?
216.
by juve1996 4y ago
That doesn't justify your argument. 50% is not a dominant position.
217.
by juve1996 4y ago
Android is a very real and clear alternative. Android dominates market share. How you can say there isn't a clear alternative, I don't know.
218.
by juve1996 4y ago
Sure it is. You're asking for sideloading apps. Guess what, that exists. The choice is there for what you're complaining about.
219.
by juve1996 4y ago
How can Apple have "too much power" here, when there is a clear alternative where it is cheaper?
220.
by juve1996 4y ago
First, I think it's a little bit different to compare these two. One is 3 years after COVID, with vaccines, some level of herd immunity, and better treatment options. The other was immediate when little was understood. China's pos
221.
by juve1996 4y ago
> Non-Tech Perspective - Tech people are difficult to work with because they are more likely to say "no" to new ideas. This is really important. Many tech people (to non-tech) come across as finding ways things WON'T work
222.
by juve1996 4y ago
> A product manager really should know and understand this, because it's not like it's impenetrable tech jargon. It's not tech jargon but it's a medical term, that has to do with people possibly dying or wounded soldi
223.
by juve1996 4y ago
The media/bad actors online/scam artists aren't concerned about being ethical with their megaphone on full blast instilling fear and panic amongst Americans. The fact is if I have the choice between being unethical and saving
224.
by juve1996 4y ago
These regulations take years to create. Then the court challenges. More than enough time for the amount of revenue loss to a developer to matter. It isn't even retaliation anymore, they can say "well they can use their own app sto
225.
by juve1996 4y ago
Apple could just remove you then from the App Store if you offer it on a 3rd party app, which I'm assuming they will
226.
by juve1996 4y ago
> Wait until she hears about hotels and flights. Are they all using the same program and colluding on pricing?
227.
by juve1996 4y ago
Sure, if there's a trend of abuse, there are remedies, lawsuits, elections, impeachment, etc. That trend doesn't exist now, and you can't use it as a shield against the law and commit crimes as you please.
228.
by juve1996 4y ago
Yep, americans aren't nearly as price conscious anymore in general, and there are just so many that are flush with cash now due to cheap money that they still don't care.
229.
by juve1996 4y ago
The problem is companies are so big and consolidated now that competitors can't as easily come in and existing competitors were bought out.
230.
by juve1996 4y ago
So basically you're saying "if he goes after my guys I'm against it even if there is evidence of wrongdoing?" If not, then why not look at the merits of the case?
231.
by juve1996 4y ago
Yea just like "COVID" would go away when Biden became president. You just have to roll your eyes at these people. They're too far gone now.
232.
by juve1996 4y ago
I think the train that this is transitory has left the station. Demand is still high and inflation rates are not going down despite shipping costs plummeting in recent months. Obviously the Fed can go overboard. But the economy is no longer
233.
by juve1996 4y ago
Artificially inducing and propping up an economy with cheap cash led to this. Now we have no choice. Inflation hurts the poor just as much as this does.
234.
by juve1996 4y ago
Higher level executives typically have very strong networks built up. Even if they get fired, they're financially already well off and can easily find another role through their networks.
235.
by juve1996 4y ago
My point was, that less than 60 years ago, it very clearly was a disadvantage, because of the system. > These disadvantages can be measured directly. There's no need to erroneously presume that Sasha and Malia are more disadvantaged
236.
by juve1996 4y ago
That's a pretty straightforward disadvantage. The only solution is to make public schools accept people of color. There's no other way around that. If you don't, they won't. What we're dealing with now is the legacy
237.
by juve1996 4y ago
> But, why do we need to use race as a proxy? Because historically race was used systemically to limit opportunities for people of color. The last school to be desegregated was in 1963. Think about that.
238.
by juve1996 4y ago
The W. Hoffmann brand pianos (at least the verticals) are fantastic. Source - I have one. Very well made, my technician loves working on it as well.
239.
by juve1996 4y ago
> why isn’t the same true for the liberalism which preceded it? > why not that earlier one too? I never made any claims on these other eras. It could be, an argument could be made. but if you agree the Roberts and Rehnquist courts wer
240.
by juve1996 4y ago
No it hasn't. It has had periods of being more, and less, polarized, based on the overton window.

More ›