Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
juunpp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
271.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
It's not any worse, just that it likely works with the CCP as opposed to the NSA, and the US obviously considers that a threat. I think it'd be more productive for the US Congress to regulate the online space and the (ab)use of pe
272.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
$14m in security. Where does that money even go, high-tech weapons?
273.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
You guys need to crunch harder. The Lord MZ isn't happy, look at his face expression.
274.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
On the other hand, there are those who are too stubborn to use anything but a dull knife and a broken hammer. There are situations where you can, e.g., make an error state impossible by defining a couple of types, or using one or two lines
275.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
It's a poor article. Their top reference is a Fox Business screenshot.
276.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
It's hilarious how overly specific that case of the imagination is. Would it make any difference if it were a GAP instead of a Macy's? Maybe Macy's burns better.
277.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Government does: https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/what-we-do/cybersec... https://www.vice.com/en/article/93ypke/the-nsa-and-cia-use-a...
278.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
> a search engine cannot know the answer to "this is the right link for this software" You would think keeping a curated list of well-known software projects (and others) would be low-hanging fruit. Instead, it is apparently be
279.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
https://adnauseam.io/
280.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Of course that's not a valid defense.
281.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
That is a bit of my feeling too, funding aside. Often it appears that they are slapping Big Tech on the wrist. Still do great work in general though, just nitpicking since we're on the topic.
282.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
I don't know how much you want to get into this, but since we're already on this topic: https://www.netlifycms.org/docs/external-oauth-clients/ https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/oauth2-pro
283.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Well, the RIAA would probably disagree the next time they issue a DMCA request. That's just not how copyright law works. Your opinion is not uncommon, though; I don't know why people adopt such a defeatist approach when corporatio
284.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Lucky you. I get the equivalent of road rage... but on the sidewalk.
285.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
The best part isn't even "sitting on their phones", but walking on their phones past other humans.
286.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Do you mean like how HN puts a number next to your name?
287.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
"Focusing on a set of software developers that were publicly pursuing a goal to make contributions for 100 days in a row" Clearly not contributions of very high quality. Must have been Hacktoberfest-quality commits.
288.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
*Anthropos, and as if learning was unique to humans? What is learning anyway if not the adaptation of the brain to its inputs?
289.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Series A, here I come.
290.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Seeing that Github is exploiting FOSS for its own commercial interests and possibly violating licenses (Copilot), it's not exactly the kind of ownership that I envision when somebody says "own your data". Don't know much
291.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
What if I vermicompost my own shit? Will the profit I make from the fertilizer pay for the sandwich? Infinite food supply? Deep thoughts; talk about Y combinator and infinite recursion.
292.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
"Own your data" But it seems to require a Github and a Vercel account: https://outstatic.com/docs/getting-started
293.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
I mostly see a red-glowing triangle on the bottom-right of the screen. Is this broken?
294.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
You don't even know what you're talking about. Their gatherings don't address "millions", but are typically just a hundred or so guys, mostly other donors. This could be hosted fine on an alternative like BBB. Writi
295.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
I get your point, but I still think they could go out of their way a bit more to use alternatives that align with their values.
296.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
I don't think it's true. For 2020, >75% come from individuals; corporate is only a tiny fraction: https://www.eff.org/files/annual-report/2020/index.html
297.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Basically 1:M, or N:M with N << M. It works relatively well on a beefy BBB instance. Jitsi from my experience craps out on low-bandwidth scenarios, but I've attended BBB meetings of respectable size with no issue.
298.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Yep, exactly. I was also wondering if I am the only one seeing this. Very large uptick of @gmail.com spam in my inbox.
299.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
jjulius, I did not state that they were helping them financially, though I also had not thought of that. I think Twitch does not display ads on non-profits streams (is this right?), but it's also extra visitors at the end of the day. M
300.
▲
by
juunpp
4y ago
Well, I have been a donor for a long time, so yes, technically I am paying them. And your second statement is false; other orgs have successfully had online gatherings on BBB, for example.
More ›