7 ms·
Seeing that Github is exploiting FOSS for its own commercial interests and possibly violating licenses (Copilot), it's not exactly the kind of ownership that I
by juunpp 4y ago
Seeing that Github is exploiting FOSS for its own commercial interests and possibly violating licenses (Copilot), it's not exactly the kind of ownership that I envision when somebody says "own your data".
Don't know much about Vercel, but I'd be skeptical.
I think it'd be an improvement over this project to make those dependencies optional. For example, if I wanted to self-host. I'm using NetlifyCMS for a project and I agree with others that the whole space could use a bit of innovation.
- AndreVitorio 4y agoIn my opinion, code I add to Github is still mine. Guess we'll have to agree to disagree here. Self-hosting would be awesome indeed, but I think doing it would be quite complicated because of the authentication part, which is needed to push changes to a git provider.
- juunpp 4y agoI don't know how much you want to get into this, but since we're already on this topic: https://www.netlifycms.org/docs/external-oauth-clients/ https://www.netlifycms.org/docs/external-oauth-clients/ https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/oauth2-provider/ https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/oauth2-provider/ NetlifyCMS allows you to define your own backends, and Gitea now has OAuth2 support. Should be able to adopt a similar strategy and allow Gitea to be used as a backend.
- AndreVitorio 4y agoThanks for the references. I'm definitely interested in adding more options to Outstatic. Haven't heard of Gitea before. It looks cool :)