justinlivi

3 ms·

1.
by justinlivi 1mo ago
I feel like the better of this is maybe "will" instead of "can"
2.
by justinlivi 4mo ago
Any supposed "AI BDFL" will be controlled by a human. The base concept is inherently flawed.
3.
by justinlivi 4mo ago
I find myself spending on average more time in LLM review/resolution loops than it would take for me to write the code by hand. Partially because once I'm in the flow I write very very quickly and the code pours out sometimes fast
4.
by justinlivi 6mo ago
From my own empirical research, the generalized models acting as specialists outperform both the tiny models acting as specialists and the generalist models acting as generalists. It seems that if peak performance is what you're after,
5.
by justinlivi 8mo ago
Compacting equals death of the session in my process. I do everything I can to avoid hitting it. If I accidentally fly too close to the sun and compact I tend to revert and start fresh. As soon as it compacts it's basically useless
6.
by justinlivi 1y ago
I think AI skeptics have a strong bias to assume that human intelligence fundamentally functions differently from LLMs. They may be correct, but we don't have a strong enough understanding of human cognition to make the claim in as unc
7.
by justinlivi 9y ago
The problem with this model is that if you aren't able to do due diligence yourself due to technical restrictions, how are your end users supposed to overcome the even greater technical restrictions on due diligence that using your ser
8.
by justinlivi 10y ago
I took the same sort of dispassionate approach, valuing the lives of the passengers above all else and staying the course otherwise. I was disappointed to discover the parsing of the results had no room for such methodology. Based my entire
9.
by justinlivi 10y ago
I'm curious to see how HIPAA regulations interact with this type of research. I would imagine it would be seriously limiting (though my actual knowledge of the laws is severely limited, so maybe not?)
10.
by justinlivi 10y ago
As someone who's never coded in either go or nim, this seems to me to be the exact opposite ideology of golang. The metaprogramming is very cool, but I imagine sharing a code base that utilizes it heavily is a nightmare.