justinjeff

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by justinjeff 10mo ago

   I think both points connect to the same underlying issue. High latency isn’t a fixed number (days vs months), and it’s not something users are simply asked to tolerate. It’s a variable tied to both the threat model and how latency is experi
2. 2.▲
   by justinjeff 10mo ago

   There’s no single “correct” latency. It’s not a fixed parameter but a variable tied to the threat model and the economics of surveillance. For low-risk, everyday coordination, minutes might be sufficient. For high-value intelligence, latenc
3. 3.▲
   by justinjeff 10mo ago

   Latency stops being a technical parameter and becomes a side effect of interaction. What matters is not delivery speed, but how meaning accumulates over time.
4. 4.▲
   Encryption is not enough: Shifting the economics of surveillance(drive.proton.me)

   5 points by justinjeff 10mo ago|6 comments
5. 5.▲
   by justinjeff 10mo ago

   Modern secure messaging focuses on encrypting content while leaving the act of communication itself observable. In high-risk environments, this metadata observability is the primary vulnerability. I'm proposing an alternative: Low-Obse