just_passing_by

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by just_passing_by 8y ago

   Sort of. If it's a liability to say nasty stuff about the employer and most of the ex-ones throw some heat the nearest possible conclusion is that the truth tends to bow to statements that are observed as outdated and controversial by
2. 2.▲
   by just_passing_by 8y ago

   I'm aware current employees comment over here. Two things to mention: principal/architect roles are always based not only on a merit of skill but politics. So, taken with a grain of salt. Moreover, if you inspect the person'
3. 3.▲
   by just_passing_by 8y ago

   >Amazon could easily have repercussions like getting picked up by the press and spun into some crazy story Didn't NY Times expose help to shape Amazon workplace for good?
4. 4.▲
   by just_passing_by 8y ago

   What amuses me is that most of retractions come from ex-Amazonians not from the current staff. This is the only company i know dealing with that much criticism from engineering. Even more to add is that the article is more or less fresh and