juped

32 ms·

421.
by juped 5y ago
They're several years old, but Duy Nguyen who invented them hasn't been around that much recently, which is why they're still marked "experimental".
422.
by juped 5y ago
yeah they're just biglaw, any biglaw firm does everything
423.
The IPv6 Mess (2002)(cr.yp.to)
2 points by juped 5y ago|0 comments
424.
by juped 5y ago
Well, time to retire the term "bikeshedding". It used to mean something (the tendency of people to have the biggest arguments over trivia because everyone feels they understand it), but apparently not anymore.
425.
by juped 5y ago
Yeah, the main purpose is just distinctness. Allowing it to jump ahead helps it guarantee this.
426.
by juped 5y ago
I'd like to think that it's because Copilot is so obviously useless that that part of it doesn't need discussion.
427.
by juped 5y ago
how does commercial use require you to delete the license text?
428.
by juped 5y ago
For what it's worth, the maximalist FSF position on linking is very unlikely to hold up in court, especially not after SCOTUS ruled in favor of Google in Google v. Oracle a few months back (which was not mere linking, but actual wholes
429.
by juped 5y ago
this does not in any way prevent commercial use
430.
by juped 5y ago
what I mean is, take any arbitrary patch thread off the front page of https://public-inbox.org/git/ and look at how people review them. they reply to the relevant commit. if you reply to the cover letter it's not
431.
by juped 5y ago
sometimes it really is cosmic rays! but you usually can't know after the fact
432.
by juped 5y ago
> You’ll rarely review single commits anyway. This is just because Github and its imitators are bad software - which isn't really git's fault. git and Linux practice only commit-level review. > Many of my colleagues view usi
433.
by juped 5y ago
the size of your branch doesn't matter, if it really is logically separable into a lot of changes. what matters is usefulness to the future reader (you, or someone else). lowering the number of commits for its own sake makes things les
434.
by juped 5y ago
"cosmic rays" are more of a well-known term of art for "single bit flipped with unknown hardware cause" than a reference to literal cosmic rays
435.
by juped 5y ago
This is still pretty superstitious, even if it's better than a lot of the stuff Github has unfortunately trained people to do. Maybe I'm naive, but I don't think git usage has to be based on superstition and fear. I have neve
436.
by juped 5y ago
Assuming you're referring to something like the github "squash and merge" button, your history is far from "clean". You make it significantly less useful by destroying information and creating megadiffs incorporatin
437.
by juped 5y ago
They are literally doing cpuid checks.
438.
by juped 5y ago
What I actually want isn't to run some more d----d javascript "server side", but to process latex to html in e.g. a hugo build.
439.
by juped 5y ago
Have Linux maintainers forgotten how to use Git? You usually apply a bugfix patch to the commit that introduced the bug.
440.
by juped 5y ago
"several hundred google frontend devs" are the teams that cause these atrocities
441.
by juped 5y ago
don't ever listen to someone on the internet talking about hipaa
442.
by juped 5y ago
Portland, Maine is a well-known city. Something like Portland, Connecticut would bave been better.
443.
by juped 5y ago
the author should not have written this. why would anyone ever hand-roll a parser? it's neither useful nor interesting
444.
by juped 5y ago
yes, the parser library is definitely the most valuable part of this.
445.
by juped 5y ago
you cannot compare single-winner and multiple-winner systems at all
446.
by juped 5y ago
you approve anyone who you approve of approval voting is a special case of score voting where the range of scores is limited to 0 and 1. if you want to express different levels of preference, you can expand this range and get full score vot
447.
by juped 5y ago
if you get nervous and ctrl-c things with no output, try using -v mode
448.
by juped 5y ago
Also from deleting their whole checkout.
449.
by juped 5y ago
Weird, it has no syntax...
450.
by juped 5y ago
You see a selection bias in posts on site like this because everyone who's doing great (or doing okay but self-inflating) wants to post about it, while people who are struggling don't want to (and are even less likely if they see

More ›