jujulet

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   Ahh, I see. Thanks!
2. 2.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   Maybe I'm missing something, but you're basically saying 'the speed of time is a function of the speed of time'.
3. 3.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   Yeah but 'fast' is also defined in terms of time...
4. 4.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   > speed of time isn't fixed and absolute Isn't 'speed' defined with the use of 'time'? Doesn't that make an expression such as 'speed of time' kind of meaningless?
5. 5.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   I also don't understand this. The boxes don't seem to be organised in any logical way, they just spell HTML?
6. 6.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   > I think the idea behind intellectual property is to encourage people to take risks associated with developing something new and profit through their innovations. No, the idea is to prevent other people from profiting through 'clai
7. 7.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   > I genuinely think the audience would have cheered for most or all of it anyhow How much of that is because the general audience is conditioned over time to adapt to that particular kind humour?
8. 8.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   That's not really saying anything, especially coming from a free-market crusader and with no reasoning/arguments attached. Also that which stringent free-marketers and ancaps consider a 'free market' probably can't
9. 9.▲
   by jujulet 8y ago

   Has anyone seen a formal proof of different cardinals based on axiomatic set theory? The diagonal argument in particular is very weak imo.