juggernautq

4 ms·

1.
by juggernautq 11y ago
> You probably already know this, but it's so your things don't get stolen and your computer doesn't get exploited and > possibly used against other people's computers. Wouldn't you agree that these are bad th
2.
by juggernautq 11y ago
That's not going to be solved by replacing flash. Or, in my opinion solved by update computer security. Computers will get hacked. Any dominating pc OS, once found a security hole, will add thousands to the bonet. This is really a fact
3.
by juggernautq 11y ago
Mozilla guys seem to think they are all gold. You need to make the decision. That's the point.
4.
by juggernautq 11y ago
Really, I would do this un-safe stuff in Virtual Machines. Use secure setup for work and other. Of course it is better to be secure, but that's not logically possible. Programmers make mistakes, it happens, you computer could be hacked
5.
by juggernautq 11y ago
Please help me understand this obsession about building a secure software. I understand there are sensitive information like bank account, email address(maybe? if you are important). But most of stuff on your computer is crap for, I'd
6.
by juggernautq 12y ago
would be interesting to factor in living cost and rank states by best-to-live-by-H1Bs.
7.
by juggernautq 12y ago
Actually this EV is the by-product of solving the game. U of Alberta must save it somewhere.. only if we can access it..
8.
by juggernautq 12y ago
This doesn't consider the post-flop strategy though. Since heads-up limit holdem has been solved, it would be interesting to look at the EV of the hand with the optimal play. I would think hands like 22 should have been weaker than sho