jtbayly

12 ms·

241.
by jtbayly 1y ago
The language under discussion is the national debt and deficit. You’re trying to make a political point by changing the definition of words. I may agree with your point, but pretending like tariffs don’t generate income that bring down the
242.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Setting aside the issue of generating money, which is not under discussion, and which loans can help with, do you really still claim that "The tariffs don't actually bring in money"? 51% of the government income is from inc
243.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Once the government is involved, everything is "interpretation." Unemployment? Well... it depends on what you mean by unemployment. We changed how we "count" a few years back. Owe? It depends what you mean by "o
244.
by jtbayly 1y ago
To say that tariffs don't actually bring in money is simply wrong. We are talking about income to the government . Yes, tariffs take actual money and give it to the government. It doesn't matter where it came from, inside or ou
245.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Flock has existed for longer than 3 years, hasn't it?
246.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Because you can't ask the search engine to summarize the views or thoughts or whatever, of the user. You have to scroll through them by the hundreds and see if any obvious nuggets stand out that you might be interested in. Yes, search
247.
by jtbayly 1y ago
If that were all they were doing, nobody would be concerned. It’s the crapifying of the MacOS in order to make it work fine with a touch interface that drives everybody bonkers about the slow merge.
248.
by jtbayly 1y ago
> No, the citations don't guarantee that there weren't any hallucinations, but if you read something that makes you go "huh" – the citations give you a low-friction opportunity to read more. Either you mean every time
249.
by jtbayly 1y ago
It was not left out of the statement. I understood that was essentially what happened by the time I got to the end of his piece. The only exception being the “with no warning or communication” part. Obviously there is disagreement about w
250.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Yes, the EU did escalate things to such an extent that absolutely countries should be considering leaving over the EU’s insane push to destroy all privacy and thus free speech.
251.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Only that last link is relevant to the question, for those who want to read about the proposed exemptions.
252.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Does this provide education or care? Being in childcare in and of itself is not correlated with better outcomes. Only high-quality care produces such results, and greater hours in non-family-member childcare results in long-term negative
253.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Why do you expect the population to hold constant? That unsupported assumption is what you base everything on. Furthermore, if the population stays the same but ages , there will be major ramifications to SS. Furthermore, if the population
254.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Sorry if I wasn’t clear initially. The point is that women should not stay home. Yes, this is “fully gendered” because reality is fully gendered. Far and away the majority of childcare is performed by women. Always has been. Always will b
255.
by jtbayly 1y ago
As in, it will accidentally fold in people’s pockets?
256.
by jtbayly 1y ago
You have demonstrated the point of the policy. What is it that is being incentivized here? Leaving your children and working all day.
257.
by jtbayly 1y ago
The real reason this is “bad” is because the policy actually being implemented is, as the GP comment demonstrates, to get women into the workforce. This requires the goal to be getting them out of the home away from their children. Thus,
258.
by jtbayly 1y ago
I was open to being convinced, but this is dumb: > The company has made its shares more valuable while making itself less valuable. Share value going up doesn’t equate to the value of the company going up, but that’s what is implied by
259.
by jtbayly 1y ago
I mean, I guess that’s one way of looking at it. On the other hand, they did abandon the product, so you’ll have to switch anyway in time.
260.
by jtbayly 1y ago
One example is FreePBX, which supposedly supports automated SSL renewal via LetsEncrypt, but constantly overwrites the config, thus breaking the “auto.” So I have to manually renew the cert, or I have to upgrade (ie rebuild the whole system
261.
by jtbayly 1y ago
This (same link I believe, not just same story) was on the front page a couple of days ago and quickly flagged dead. I’m surprised to see it again so quickly. I would have thought a flagged link wouldn’t be possible to submit again and get
262.
by jtbayly 1y ago
No, you cannot vote up or down the official ads on HN.
263.
by jtbayly 1y ago
HN has advertising too. I don’t claim it’s the same, but let’s be accurate.
264.
by jtbayly 1y ago
I believe there is a typo here: y = 10 * sin(πt/2) * sin(0.02 * πt) On the previous two slides the end is sin(0.2 * πt)
265.
by jtbayly 1y ago
I hope we wouldn’t hang him... lol
266.
by jtbayly 1y ago
I'm not understanding the difference between Main Editor and Live Preview on the demo page. They look identical to me. And both seem to have a live preview, as far as I can tell.
267.
by jtbayly 1y ago
This is so weird that a random website on a random server (having SSL doesn’t change that in the slightest) is considered less of a risk than a file I have on my own computer. Can somebody help me understand what’s going on?
268.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Last time I used Gemini CLI it still couldn’t consistently edit a file. That was just a few weeks ago. In fact, it would go into a loop attempting the same edit, burning through many thousands of tokens and calls in the process, re-reading
269.
by jtbayly 1y ago
Would you be willing to share your CLAUDE.md file contents? I’m vibe coding in Elixir.
270.
by jtbayly 1y ago
That doesn’t really show me how to do fine-tuning, but there is a link to a notebook in there that does. Thanks!

More ›