Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jsw97
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jsw97
5d ago
Agreed. Just to be helpful if anyone is searching for layla, it's laya.
2.
▲
by
jsw97
6d ago
Acting with urgency is a bit at odds with discovering flaws in your plan. If you're sprinting you're less likely to notice smells and things that are inelegant, more likely to paper them over. That said, there is a time for urgenc
3.
▲
by
jsw97
9d ago
With human cooperation. Somebody exposes a bio lab as an mcp.
4.
▲
by
jsw97
12d ago
I bet this is what the thinking blocks look like. If so then it maybe it is intelligible, just not to us. I have the same problem.
5.
▲
by
jsw97
13d ago
I know this is intended as a joke but there is something to it. The public market has a way of elevating profit over everything else, even if you start with the best intentions. Remember “don’t be evil”?
6.
▲
by
jsw97
15d ago
One complication for geofencing is that the Mass law applies if one party is in the state. So if you're on a zoom with someone in Mass, you're still violating.
7.
▲
by
jsw97
16d ago
Just to be clear, I have not seen this behavior. If this is true, though, then given the way their chat operates, this might be more dangerous than it seems. One of the things I like about ChatGPT is its memory, the way it kind of seamlessl
8.
▲
by
jsw97
16d ago
Even beyond this, if you create circumstances where mass commission of consequential felonies is an inevitable result, I suspect that is also illegal. 100% this just gets ignored by the Mass attorney general though.
9.
▲
by
jsw97
16d ago
Not sure why my comment merited a downvote. In any case, quoting from Mass law: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Cha... The term ''interception'' means t
10.
▲
by
jsw97
16d ago
Argument for only wins because of the weight of the lawyers they can bring to bear. Clearly ephemeral recording for the purposes of processing violates the spirit of the statute at least. And there is this, from the MGL: The term 
11.
▲
by
jsw97
16d ago
This is, I believe, a felony in Massachusetts. https://www.romanolaw.com/can-i-record-a-conversation-in-mas... (Linking to discussion, not the statute, because it confirms that it is in fact enforced.) Come to think of it,
12.
▲
by
jsw97
17d ago
Even you think both cheat, you can't possibly think they both cheat the same amount.
13.
▲
by
jsw97
17d ago
The last time I checked there was a loophole — if you provide feedback in-session (responding to “how are we doing” or “which prompt is better”) then they can use that feedback + relevant context. Relevant context for chatgpt might include
14.
▲
by
jsw97
17d ago
Yeah this is a land mine. Even if you opt out of them training on your conversations, giving “feedback on a new version” or answering “how are we doing” or whatever can slurp up all relevant context, which if you think about it can probably
15.
▲
by
jsw97
18d ago
I think it’s probably not surprising that they would go up to the contractual limit or into a grey area; but exceeding that would require too much coordination among individuals, as you say.
16.
▲
by
jsw97
18d ago
Would that be more or less unlikely than accidentally hacking another company? More or less unlikely than colonizing an obscure wiki? Highly persistent agents + vibe-coded security seems like a problem.
17.
▲
by
jsw97
19d ago
A blog or YouTube channel would be a nice halfway step to test the waters. A publisher might like to see that anyway. It would give you a natural feel for what the appetite is and where you want to put the level of the presentation.
18.
▲
by
jsw97
21d ago
Sure they make sense — you need some incentive to drive the price to zero.
19.
▲
by
jsw97
21d ago
In the past I would have thought this would incentivize finding bugs that might never be found. However it is now clear that all bugs that can be found will be found. So this makes a ton of sense.
20.
▲
by
jsw97
22d ago
To me the striking thing is that the work, to the extent that I can tell, is an innocuous-seeming data exercise. Which suggests to me that an agent or agents just organically came up with this as a convenient memory technique, rather than a
21.
▲
by
jsw97
22d ago
If agents start using public writable scratch, it seems like that would be a place for bad actors to put prompt injection attempts. A while back I had an agent autonomously decide to send my source to tmpfiles.org (I interrupted), which see
22.
▲
by
jsw97
23d ago
Providers should surge capacity when another provider fails.
23.
▲
by
jsw97
23d ago
This of course could be a coincidence. But I suppose also that if one goes down the others get slammed, so there could be a cascade. If I were another provider I would possibly monitor Claude outages (or vice versa) as a load predictor.
24.
▲
Gelman: Shocked by Ariely 2002 replication failure
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
by
jsw97
24d ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
by
jsw97
25d ago
There is such a smell around this whole literature. I wonder what it's like to be a grad student in social psychology right now. When the norm is surprising results, any responsible, competent researcher is going to realize that they c
26.
▲
by
jsw97
1mo ago
1% of market cap does not feel right for this. I guess to the general public $16 billion sounds like a lot.
27.
▲
by
jsw97
1mo ago
I built a harness for my own use that allows the agent to fork its own history. So for example it can “compact from” a specific item, replacing a branch with a summary; or do an “excursion”, basically a temporary branch, which is like a sub
28.
▲
by
jsw97
1mo ago
Whenever I hear these stories about multiple cultures having the same hallucination, I think that we have to give some weight to the possibility that the little people are real and the mushrooms just let us see them.
29.
▲
by
jsw97
2mo ago
Buying a house isn't just about expected return. It's also about hedging. You need to live somewhere, so you have an implicit liability of a stream of rental costs. The most natural hedge for that is a house. If expected future re
30.
▲
by
jsw97
2mo ago
A fundamental limitation of third-party harnesses is that they can't see all the data. As earendil pointed out, providers are now moving to encrypted thinking blocks. As an example, this could affect compaction. If pi calls another age
More ›